Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Regional SUV quantification in hybrid PET/MR, a comparison of two atlas-based automatic brain segmentation methods

Weiwei Ruan, Xun Sun, Xuehan Hu, Fang Liu, Fan Hu, Yongxue Zhang and Xiaoli Lan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3005;
Weiwei Ruan
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xun Sun
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuehan Hu
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fang Liu
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fan Hu
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongxue Zhang
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoli Lan
1Dept Nuclear Medicine, Wuhan Union Hospital Wuhan China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3005

Objectives: Quantitative analysis of brain PET depends on structural segmentation, which can be time-consuming and operator-dependent when performed manually. Previous automatic segmentation methods based on an atlas usually fitted subjects’ images onto an atlas template for group analysis, which changed the individuals’ images and probably affected regional PET quantitation. We proposed an automatic segmentation method, registering atlas template to subjects’ images (RATSI), as shown in figure 1, which created an individual atlas template and may be more accurate and useful for PET quantitative analysis.

Methods: We segmented two representative brain areas in twenty Parkinson disease (PD) and eight multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients performed in hybrid positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR). The segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and Hausdorff distance (HD), and the standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements of these two automatic segmentation methods were compared, using manual segmentation as a reference. Further, RATSI was used to compare regional differences in cerebral metabolism pattern between PD and MSA patients.

Results: The DC of RATSI increased and the HD decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with RSIAT in PD, while the results of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found no significant differences in the SUVmean and SUVmax among the two automatic and the manual segmentation methods. For quantification in MSA and PD, the SUVmean in the segmented cerebellar gray matter for the MSA group was significantly lower compared with the PD group (P<0.05), as shown in figure 2, which is consistent with previous reports.

Conclusions: RATSI was more accurate for the caudate nucleus and putamen automatic segmentation, while has little effects for their max and mean SUV calculation in hybrid PET/MR.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regional SUV quantification in hybrid PET/MR, a comparison of two atlas-based automatic brain segmentation methods
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Regional SUV quantification in hybrid PET/MR, a comparison of two atlas-based automatic brain segmentation methods
Weiwei Ruan, Xun Sun, Xuehan Hu, Fang Liu, Fan Hu, Yongxue Zhang, Xiaoli Lan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3005;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regional SUV quantification in hybrid PET/MR, a comparison of two atlas-based automatic brain segmentation methods
Weiwei Ruan, Xun Sun, Xuehan Hu, Fang Liu, Fan Hu, Yongxue Zhang, Xiaoli Lan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3005;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
  • Simplifying and Confirming Ketosis: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Cardiac Sarcoid Assessment
Show more

Tech Papers I: Instrumentation & Data Analysis Technologist Papers

  • Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in carotid plaques with 18F-FDG PET /MR
  • Quantification Evaluation of 99mTc-MDP concentration in the lumbar spine with SPECT/CT: compare with bone mineral density
Show more Tech Papers I: Instrumentation & Data Analysis Technologist Papers

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire