Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Review ArticleContinuing Education

Imaging the Cancer Immune Environment and Its Response to Pharmacologic Intervention, Part 1: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT

Amir Iravani and Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2020, 61 (7) 943-950; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234278
Amir Iravani
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney J. Hicks
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Four patterns of response: durable-fast (metastatic melanoma with early complete metabolic response after 4 cycles of ipilimumab and nivolumab at 3 mo, which had to be stopped because of colitis), durable-slow (metastatic NSCLC with gradual decrease in tumor burden in response to pembrolizumab), pseudoprogression-transient increase in size of target lesion (metastatic melanoma with initial increase in size of left inguinal lymph node [arrow] and subsequent resolution), and pseudoprogression-regression of target lesions and transient development of new lesions (metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with development of new mediastinal lymph nodes [arrow] despite regression of baseline lesions and subsequent complete metabolic response).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Metabolic response with residual morphologic lesion (arrows) as seen on PET (top), CT (middle), and PET/CT (bottom) images. (A) Metastatic melanoma at baseline shows multiple 18F-FDG–avid metastases. (B) At 3 mo after treatment with 4 cycles of immunotherapy, marked metabolic response is seen on PET, but residual soft-tissue lesions persist on CT (arrows). Diffuse bone marrow 18F-FDG uptake on posttreatment scan is suggestive of systemic immune response.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Primary oligoprogression: metastatic melanoma with dissociated response 3 mo after treatment with pembrolizumab demonstrating regression of some sites (solid arrows) and progression of other sites (arrowheads); at 6 mo, solitary hepatic metastasis continued to progress (dashed arrows). Secondary progression: metastatic melanoma with complete response at 5 mo after combination ipilimumab and nivolumab with subsequent secondary progression in solitary left adrenal metastasis (arrow); patient underwent adrenalectomy and continued single-agent nivolumab.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Sarcoidosis with widespread lymphadenopathy. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma was treated with pembrolizumab, with stable disease in left axillary region (arrows). At 3 mo, sarcoidlike lymphadenopathy in chest was noticed (B, bracket). This finding progressed at 5 mo, with right supraclavicular (C, arrowhead) and upper abdominal nodal involvement. After short course of corticosteroids, sarcoidosis resolved completely. Underlying mild thyroiditis became exacerbated at 3 mo (circled).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Immune-Modified 18F-FDG PET Response Criteria—PECRIT, PERCIMT, and imPERCIST

    ParameterPECRIT (15)PERCIMT (17)imPERCIST 5 (18)
    Tumor typeMelanomaMelanomaMelanoma
    ICIAnti-CTLA-4Anti-CTLA-4Anti-CTLA-4
    n204160
    Timing3–4 wk3 mo3 mo
    Standard of referenceClinical benefit: PR or CR at 4 mo or SD ≥ 6 mo per RECIST 1.1 (45)Clinical benefit: composite of clinical follow-up, 18F-FDG PET/CT, brain MRI, and LDHFollow-up and overall survival
    Definition of responseCR or PR: per RECIST 1.1CR: resolution of all lesions on PE, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and brain MRI; decrease or no increase in LDH; no new lesionCR, PR, or SD: per PERCIST in 5 lesions
    PR: decrease in size or resolution of lesions on PE, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and brain MRI; decrease or no increase in LDH; no new lesion
    SD: per RECIST 1.1 and >15.5% increase in SULpeak per PERCIST (46)SD: neither CR/PR nor PD
    Definition of progressionPer RECIST 1.1No clinical benefit and new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT as followsChange in sum of SULpeak in 5 lesions > 30%
    For lesions < 1 cm require ≥ 4 new lesions
    For lesions 1–1.5 cm require ≥ 3 new lesionsNew lesions can be incorporated
    For lesions > 1.5 cm require ≥ 2 new lesions
    Emphasis and advantagesCombining anatomic and metabolic criteriaIncorporation of clinical benefit in criteriaNew lesions are incorporated to sum of metabolic activity of lesions and not immediately considered PD
    Early response assessmentNumber and metabolic size of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT
    • PECRIT = PET/CT Criteria for Early Prediction of Response to ICI Therapy; PERCIMT = PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy; imPERCIST = Immunotherapy-Modified PERCIST; LYRIC = Lymphoma Response to Immunotherapy Criteria; iPERCIST = Immune PERCIST; HL = Hodgkin lymphoma; PR = partial response; CR = complete response; SD = stable disease; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; PE = physical examination; CMR = complete metabolic response; PMR = partial metabolic response; SMD = stable metabolic disease; PD = progressive disease; SULpeak = lean body mass–corrected SUVpeak; PMD = progressive metabolic disease; UPMD = unconfirmed PMD; IR = indeterminate response; SPD = sum of product of diameters; CPMD = confirmed progressive metabolic disease; PPD = product of perpendicular diameters.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Immune-Modified 18F-FDG PET Response Criteria—LYRIC and iPERCIST

    ParameterLYRIC (19,20)iPERCIST (22)
    Tumor typeHLNSCLC
    ICIAnti-PD-1Anti-PD-1
    n1628
    Timing3 mo2 mo
    Standard of referenceMultidisciplinary experts’ consensus based on clinical and imaging resultsClinical benefit and confirmatory 18F-FDG PET/CT or CT 4 wk later
    Definition of responseCR or PR: per Lugano (21)CMR, PMR, or SMD: per PERCIST
    Definition of progressionPer Lugano with following exceptionsPMD as per PERCIST is considered UPMD
    IR1: ≥50% increase in SPD in first 12 wk
    IR2a: <50% increase in SPD with new lesionsUPMD needs to be confirmed by second 18F-FDG PET/CT at 4–8 wk later to be classified as CPMD
    IR2b: <50% increase in SPD with ≥50% increase in PPD of lesion or set of lesions at any time during treatment
    IR3: increase in 18F-FDG uptake without concomitant increase in lesion size meeting criteria for PD
    Emphasis and advantagesIntroduction of concept of IR categories until biopsy or subsequent imaging confirms either pseudoprogression or true progressionIntroduction of concept of UPMD with clinical stability
    Allowing treatment continuation
    • PECRIT = PET/CT Criteria for Early Prediction of Response to ICI Therapy; PERCIMT = PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy; imPERCIST = Immunotherapy-Modified PERCIST; LYRIC = Lymphoma Response to Immunotherapy Criteria; iPERCIST = Immune PERCIST; HL = Hodgkin lymphoma; PR = partial response; CR = complete response; SD = stable disease; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; PE = physical examination; CMR = complete metabolic response; PMR = partial metabolic response; SMD = stable metabolic disease; PD = progressive disease; SULpeak = lean body mass–corrected SUVpeak; PMD = progressive metabolic disease; UPMD = unconfirmed PMD; IR = indeterminate response; SPD = sum of product of diameters; CPMD = confirmed progressive metabolic disease; PPD = product of perpendicular diameters.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 7
July 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging the Cancer Immune Environment and Its Response to Pharmacologic Intervention, Part 1: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging the Cancer Immune Environment and Its Response to Pharmacologic Intervention, Part 1: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT
Amir Iravani, Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2020, 61 (7) 943-950; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234278

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging the Cancer Immune Environment and Its Response to Pharmacologic Intervention, Part 1: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT
Amir Iravani, Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2020, 61 (7) 943-950; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234278
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 18F-FDG PET/CT IMAGING OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
    • MONITORING OF SYSTEMIC IMMUNE RESPONSE
    • CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • CD70-Targeted Immuno-PET/CT Imaging of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Translational Study
  • Fibroblast Activation Protein and Glycolysis in Lymphoma Diagnosis: Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Signaling Pathways That Drive 18F-FDG Accumulation in Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Treatment Response Evaluation in Prostate Cancer Using PSMA PET/CT
  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • molecular imaging
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • immunotherapy
  • immune response
  • therapeutic monitoring
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire