Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

Reply: Flare Phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET After Resection of Gliomas

Christian P. Filss, Carina Stegmayr, Philipp Lohmann, Norbert Galldiks and Karl-Josef Langen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (12) 1852; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.251819
Christian P. Filss
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse Julich, Germany D-52425 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.j.langen@fz-juelich.de
Carina Stegmayr
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse Julich, Germany D-52425 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.j.langen@fz-juelich.de
Philipp Lohmann
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse Julich, Germany D-52425 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.j.langen@fz-juelich.de
Norbert Galldiks
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse Julich, Germany D-52425 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.j.langen@fz-juelich.de
Karl-Josef Langen
*Forschungszentrum Jülich Wilhelm-Johnen Strasse Julich, Germany D-52425 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.j.langen@fz-juelich.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REPLY: We thank Dr. Nabavizadeh and colleagues for bringing up postoperative ischemia as a possible cause for the flare phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET after resection of gliomas (1). Indeed, it cannot be excluded that postoperative ischemia has contributed to the observed flare phenomenon. On the other hand, we would like to emphasize that increased amino acid uptake in subacute ischemia is generally mild and in the range of a tumor-to-brain ratio of 2 or less. In contrast, some patients with flare phenomenon in our study (2) had maximum tumor-to-brain ratios of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) uptake of up to 5 or above, which has not been reported in acute and subacute ischemia. According to the authors’ suggestion to exclude ischemia in areas with flare phenomenon, we identified 1 patient in our database with a flare phenomenon in postoperative 18F-FET PET who simultaneously underwent MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (patient 36, Fig. 1). However, the typical signs of ischemia, that is, a high signal intensity on DWI associated with low signal intensity on apparent diffusion coefficient maps, could not be identified in the corresponding area showing the flare phenomenon in postoperative 18F-FET PET. Thus, DWI in this patient with a flare phenomenon does not support the “ischemia hypothesis.” Nevertheless, this important aspect should be considered and further investigated in future studies.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Brain scans of patient 20 d after resection of recurrent, right frontal oligodendroglioma World Health Organization II. 18F-FET PET shows increased uptake at posterior border of resection cavity (white arrow) but no signs of ischemia, that is, a high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging associated with low signal intensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map.

Footnotes

  • Published online Aug. 28, 2020.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nabavizadeh SA,
    2. Nasrallah IM,
    3. Pryma DA
    . Flare phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET after resection of gliomas: potential contribution from postoperative ischemia. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1852.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Filss CP,
    2. Schmitz AK,
    3. Stoffels G,
    4. et al
    . Flare phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET after resection of gliomas. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1294–1299.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 12
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: Flare Phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET After Resection of Gliomas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: Flare Phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET After Resection of Gliomas
Christian P. Filss, Carina Stegmayr, Philipp Lohmann, Norbert Galldiks, Karl-Josef Langen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (12) 1852; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251819

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply: Flare Phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET After Resection of Gliomas
Christian P. Filss, Carina Stegmayr, Philipp Lohmann, Norbert Galldiks, Karl-Josef Langen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (12) 1852; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251819
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reply: Flare Phenomenon in O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET After Resection of Gliomas
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Thoughts on “Tumor Sink Effect in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: Myth or Reality?”
  • Tumor Sink Effect: Myth or Reality?
  • Reply: Posterior Cingulate Involvement Does Not Argue against LATE -- and Who Said It Does?
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire