Abstract
588
Purpose: The PSMA ligand 18F-PSMA-1007 has several principal advantages for imaging prostate cancer when compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this matched-pair analysis was to compare the detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.
Methods: All patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (median PSA-value 0.90 ng/ml, range 0.18-107.70 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy undergoing 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT at our institution were included in this study (n=102). On the basis of Gleason score, PSA-values, T- and N-stage and antihormonal treatment corresponding 68Ga-PSMA-11PET/CT scans were matched based on the institution´s database. Both 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CTs (total n=204) were reviewed by one nuclear medicine physician. PET positive lesions were grouped into a) local recurrence, b) pelvic lymph nodes (LN), c) extra pelvic LN, d) bone and e) others. For each region, SUVmax of the lesion with the highest PSMA-ligand uptake was noted. Detection rates were determined and SUVmax of suspicious lesions were compared.
Results: Overall, patient-based detection rate was 80.4% (82/102) for both 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, respectively. In 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, 126 lesions were rated as suspicious for recurrent PC (mean SUVmax 14.7 ± 15.6, range 3.3-112.5), while in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET 124 lesions were rated as suspicious (mean SUVmax 19.3 ± 29.9, range 2.7-234.4, p= 0.816 for comparison with 68Ga-PSMA-11). Sites for suspicious lesions were pelvic LN, local recurrence, extra-pelvic LNM, bone metastases and others in 34%, 25%, 17%, 22% and 2% on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and 29%, 21%, 28%, 18% and 4% on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET.
Conclusions: In this matched pair analysis tumor detection rates with 18F-PSMA-1007 appear similar to 68Ga-PSMA-11 in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.