Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detects prostate cancer at early biochemical recurrence with superior detection rate and reader agreement when compared to 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a prospective head-to-head comparative phase 3 study

Jeremie Calais, Francesco Ceci, Matthias Eiber, Jeannine Gartmann, Kathleen Nguyen, Vincent Lok, David Elashoff, Tristan Grogan, Roger Slavik, Robert Reiter, Matthew Rettig, Hossein Jadvar, Tore Bach-Gansmo, Bital Savir-Baruch, Michael Hofman, Cristina Nanni, Christoph Rischpler, Thomas Hope, Wolfgang Fendler and Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 587;
Jeremie Calais
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Ceci
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
6Techinical University Munich Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeannine Gartmann
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Nguyen
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Lok
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Elashoff
9Department of Medicine Statistics Core UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tristan Grogan
9Department of Medicine Statistics Core UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Slavik
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Reiter
10Department of Urology UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Rettig
10Department of Urology UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hossein Jadvar
12University of Southern California Pasadena CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tore Bach-Gansmo
3Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bital Savir-Baruch
2Loyola University Medical Center Maywood IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Hofman
5Peter MacCalllum Cancer Institute Ripponlea VIC Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Nanni
4Ospedale S.Orsola-Malpighi Bologna Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Rischpler
7Dept. of Nuclear Medicine Technical University Munich Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Hope
11University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Fendler
1Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
8Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division UCLA Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

587

Purpose: This is a prospective single-center, single-arm, head-to-head phase 3 comparative study of paired 18F-fluciclovine (FACBC) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT scans for localizing prostate cancer (PCa) early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) (NCT02940262).

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with BCR and prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels ranging from ≥0.2 to ≤2.0 ng/mL without any prior salvage therapy were included. All patients underwent FACBC and PSMA PET/CT scans within ≤15 days. PET/CT scans were each interpreted by 3 independent blinded expert readers not involved in study design and data acquisition. Region consensus interpretation (T,N,M1a,M1b,M1c) was generated based on majority rule in cases of reader disagreement (2 vs 1). PET/CT scans were considered as positive if any region was rated as positive . Detection rates per-patient and per-region served as primary study endpoint.

Results: Median time interval between the 2 scans was 6 days (range 1-15). Median PSA level at the time of imaging was 0.50 ng/ml (mean 0.63; range 0.2-2.0 ng/ml). The detection rates were significantly lower with FACBC than with PSMA PET/CT for the pelvic region (N) (8% vs 30%; p=0.003), for any extra-pelvic lesions (M) (0% vs. 16%; p=0.008) and per-patient (26% vs 56%; p=0.003). Reader agreement for PSMA PET/CT image interpretations was significantly higher than for FACBC PET/CT by patient (p=0.015) and region (p<0.001 to 0.046) based analysis.

Conclusions: In patients with BCR and low serum PSA levels after RP, PSMA PET/CT has higher detection rates and better reader agreement than FACBC PET/CT. Therefore, PSMA PET/CT should be the imaging modality of choice in patients with early BCR.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Detection rates per-patient and per-region

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detects prostate cancer at early biochemical recurrence with superior detection rate and reader agreement when compared to 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a prospective head-to-head comparative phase 3 study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detects prostate cancer at early biochemical recurrence with superior detection rate and reader agreement when compared to 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a prospective head-to-head comparative phase 3 study
Jeremie Calais, Francesco Ceci, Matthias Eiber, Jeannine Gartmann, Kathleen Nguyen, Vincent Lok, David Elashoff, Tristan Grogan, Roger Slavik, Robert Reiter, Matthew Rettig, Hossein Jadvar, Tore Bach-Gansmo, Bital Savir-Baruch, Michael Hofman, Cristina Nanni, Christoph Rischpler, Thomas Hope, Wolfgang Fendler, Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 587;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detects prostate cancer at early biochemical recurrence with superior detection rate and reader agreement when compared to 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a prospective head-to-head comparative phase 3 study
Jeremie Calais, Francesco Ceci, Matthias Eiber, Jeannine Gartmann, Kathleen Nguyen, Vincent Lok, David Elashoff, Tristan Grogan, Roger Slavik, Robert Reiter, Matthew Rettig, Hossein Jadvar, Tore Bach-Gansmo, Bital Savir-Baruch, Michael Hofman, Cristina Nanni, Christoph Rischpler, Thomas Hope, Wolfgang Fendler, Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 587;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

  • Added value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / Computed Tomography (CT) with radioiodine whole body scan in follow up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
  • Accuracy of 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET for detecting high grade glioma recurrence: size matters
  • Surveillance Imaging of Laryngeal Cancer - Does FDG PET/CT Impact Survival?
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Prostate Diagnosis I

  • The contribution of multiparametric pelvic and whole body MR to the interpretation of 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FCH) or 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT in the detection of pelvic recurrence or distant metastases in patients with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
  • PSMA-ligand PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007
  • Prospective evaluation of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
Show more Prostate Diagnosis I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire