Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportNeurosciences

Grading of Glioma: Comparison between18F-FMISO-PET, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gadolinium Enhancement

Yasutaka Fushimi, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoichi Shimizu, Kohei Sano, Tomohisa Okada, Sonoko Oshima, Takuya Hinoda, Satoshi Nakajima, Takayoshi Ishimori, Yuji Nakamoto and Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 398;
Yasutaka Fushimi
4Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiki Arakawa
5Neurosurgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoichi Shimizu
6Radioisotopes Research Laboratory Kyoto University Hospital Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kohei Sano
4Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomohisa Okada
1Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
2Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonoko Oshima
4Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takuya Hinoda
4Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoshi Nakajima
4Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takayoshi Ishimori
3Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuji Nakamoto
1Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
2Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaori Togashi
1Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
2Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

398

Purpose: Pre-operative prediction of glioma grading is always challenging, and high accuracy for prediction is always preferable. Recently, classification of glioma has been updated to use integrated phenotypic and genotypic parameters for brain tumor classification. In this study, we investigated whether hypoxic tracer, 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), add the values in prediction of glioma grading compared with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and gadolinium enhancement on MRI. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven cerebral glioma grade 2, 3, and 4 were finally included. FMISO were intravenously administered to them and PET/CT scan were performed 4 hours after the injection. PET images, ADC map images of MRI, and Gd-enhanced 3D T1-weighted images were anatomically co-registered to individual pre-contrast 3D T1-weighted images respectively by using SPM12. Mean and max value, tumor-normal ratio (TNR) of mean and max value were calculated for SUV of FMISO, ADC, and enhancement ratio (ER), respectively. ROC analysis for differentiating high-grade tumor (grade 3 or 4) from low-grade tumor (grade 2) was conducted between SUV, ADC, and ER.

Results: FMISOmax_TNR showed the highest ROC values (0.946) among all variables. Enhancement_mean was high (0.926) among ADC paramters, ADCmin_TNR was high among ADC parameters (0.846). Combination of FMISO, ADC and ER showed ROC values of 0.975.

Conclusions: FMISO PET added more diagnostic values in differentiation between high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Grading of Glioma: Comparison between18F-FMISO-PET, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gadolinium Enhancement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Grading of Glioma: Comparison between18F-FMISO-PET, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gadolinium Enhancement
Yasutaka Fushimi, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoichi Shimizu, Kohei Sano, Tomohisa Okada, Sonoko Oshima, Takuya Hinoda, Satoshi Nakajima, Takayoshi Ishimori, Yuji Nakamoto, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 398;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Grading of Glioma: Comparison between18F-FMISO-PET, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gadolinium Enhancement
Yasutaka Fushimi, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoichi Shimizu, Kohei Sano, Tomohisa Okada, Sonoko Oshima, Takuya Hinoda, Satoshi Nakajima, Takayoshi Ishimori, Yuji Nakamoto, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 398;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurosciences

  • PET CT Quantification to direct Alzheimer’s patients to anti-amyloid therapy
  • Multicenter trial study for usefulness of physical parameters toward the standardization of brain SPECT image: relation to visual analysis
  • Assessment of Brain Perfusion 123I-IMP SPECT imaging Using Low Energy High Resolution Collimator image reconstructed by Flash 3D
Show more Neurosciences

Brain PET/MRI

  • Neurometabolic Disruption Following Sports Concussion Assessed with PET/MRI
  • C-11-Raclopride-displacement and altered functional connectivity after intranasal application of insulin in humans. A PET/MRI study.
  • Texture Analysis of 11C-methinine PET Images may Facilitate to Evaluate the MGMT Methylation Status in Gliomas: Based on Integrated PET/MR Imaging
Show more Brain PET/MRI

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire