Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Gurdip K. Azad; Musib Siddique; Benjamin Taylor; Adrian Green; Jim O’Doherty; Joanna Gariani; Glen M. Blake; Janine Mansi; Vicky Goh; Gary J.R. Cook

doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.208710

Research ArticleClinical

Open Access

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Gurdip K. Azad, Musib Siddique, Benjamin Taylor, Adrian Green, Jim O’Doherty, Joanna Gariani, Glen M. Blake, Janine Mansi, Vicky Goh and Gary J.R. Cook

Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2019, 60 (3) 322-327; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.208710

Gurdip K. Azad

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Musib Siddique

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Benjamin Taylor

2Department of Oncology, Guys and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Adrian Green

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Jim O’Doherty

3King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Centre, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

4Department of Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar; and

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Joanna Gariani

5Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Glen M. Blake

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Janine Mansi

2Department of Oncology, Guys and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Vicky Goh

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Gary J.R. Cook

1Cancer Imaging Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

3King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Centre, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Figures & Data
Supplemental
Info & Metrics
PDF

Data supplements

Supplemental Data

Files in this Data Supplement:

Supplemental Data

PreviousNext

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Vol. 60, Issue 3

March 1, 2019

Table of Contents
Table of Contents (PDF)
About the Cover
Index by author

Download PDF

Article Alerts

User Name *

Password *

Email *

Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.

Your Personal Message

Citation Tools

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Gurdip K. Azad, Musib Siddique, Benjamin Taylor, Adrian Green, Jim O’Doherty, Joanna Gariani, Glen M. Blake, Janine Mansi, Vicky Goh, Gary J.R. Cook

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 322-327; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.208710

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Gurdip K. Azad, Musib Siddique, Benjamin Taylor, Adrian Green, Jim O’Doherty, Joanna Gariani, Glen M. Blake, Janine Mansi, Vicky Goh, Gary J.R. Cook

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 322-327; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.208710

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget
Facebook Like
Google Plus One

Bookmark this article

User Name *

Password *

Remember my user name & password.

Jump to section

Article
Figures & Data
Supplemental
Info & Metrics
PDF

Practical Methods for Estimating Metabolic Flux (Ki) to Assess Response to Therapy via Static PET Scans
This Month in JNM

PubMed
Google Scholar

Cited By...

68Ga-Bisphosphonates for the Imaging of Extraosseous Calcification by Positron Emission Tomography
Molecular Imaging of Bone Metastases and Their Response to Therapy
Practical Methods for Estimating Metabolic Flux (Ki) to Assess Response to Therapy via Static PET Scans

Google Scholar

Clinical

Tau^IQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Addition of ¹³¹I-MIBG to PRRT (⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Show more Clinical

Oncology

Tau^IQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Addition of ¹³¹I-MIBG to PRRT (⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Show more Oncology

Keywords

breast cancer
bone metastases
heterogeneity, 18F-fluoride PET/CT

Main menu

User menu

Search

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Data supplements

Supplemental Data

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Clinical

Oncology

Similar Articles

Keywords