Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody

Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Bernard M. Fine, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Steven M. Larson, Stephen E. Fleming, Josef J. Fox, Sarah M. Cheal, Joseph A. O’Donoghue, Shutian Ruan, Govind Ragupathi, Serge K. Lyashchenko, John L. Humm, Howard I. Scher, Mithat Gönen, Simon P. Williams, Daniel C. Danila and Michael J. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2019, 60 (11) 1517-1523; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.222844
Jorge A. Carrasquillo
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard M. Fine
4Genentech, South San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
3Center for Targeted Radioimmunotherapy and Diagnosis, Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Larson
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
3Center for Targeted Radioimmunotherapy and Diagnosis, Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen E. Fleming
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josef J. Fox
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah M. Cheal
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph A. O’Donoghue
5Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shutian Ruan
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Govind Ragupathi
6Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge K. Lyashchenko
7Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Humm
5Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard I. Scher
6Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
8Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mithat Gönen
9Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon P. Williams
4Genentech, South San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel C. Danila
6Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
8Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Morris
6Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
8Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A maximum-intensity projections of selected patients with bone metastases of various extents. Images were acquired at 6 d after injection and are displayed at same gray scale with SUVmax of 10. Patients in upper panel (particularly patients 3 and 9) have extensive metastatic bone disease. Uptake in noninvolved bone is low and not definitely seen in projection images. Physiologic blood-pool activity was prominent soon after injection, and much less blood-pool activity is seen in late images in those with more extensive bony disease. Uptake in liver is partially reflective of blood-pool activity and parenchymal accumulation. Low-level uptake is also noted in kidneys, and variable uptake is noted in bowel (intraluminal), which probably represents route of excretion.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A images of patient 13 obtained 6 d after injection. Images showed bone uptake in vertebral lesion (middle panel, midline arrow), in addition to uptake in left axillary node (middle panel arrow in left axilla) that was biopsy-proven metastatic disease. Left cervical nodal uptake (left panel, arrow) and retroperitoneal node (right panel, arrow) showed abnormal uptake. Although these were negative on concurrent CT, follow-up 18F-FDG scan showed mild uptake at these sites.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Number of lesions identified on 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A correlated negatively with clearance of radioactivity from blood pool. SUVmean in blood was lower in patients with higher number of lesions when all 19 patients were considered (last scan, 4–8 d) (Pearson r = −0.78, P = 0.0001) or when patients were scanned on most common day, which was 6 d (n = 16) (Pearson r = −0.91, P < 0.0001).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Positive Findings by Imaging Modality

    Bone lesionsSoft-tissue lesions*
    Patient no.89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A+Bone scan+CT+CIM+89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A+CT+
    13431163211
    2717377300
    38088748862
    4854506600
    5345800
    63241174500
    72730223100
    84084718500
    98380318051
    10420222
    11171471483
    12830103300
    13922172540
    1456131460
    153038375100
    16201141100
    17100062
    183227143100
    191115181900
    Total5156504137083811
    • ↵* Nodes, liver, lung, and prostatic bed.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Correlation Between SUVmax in Tumor vs. Patient Outcome, PSA, and Immunohistochemistry

    Parameter compared with SUVmaxCorrelation
    Time from imaging injection to deathPearson r = −0.12, P = 0.62 (n = 19)
    Time on DSTP3086S ADC treatmentPearson r = −0.59, P = 0.054 (n = 16)
    Baseline PSA levelPearson r = 0.1, P = 0.67 (n = 19)
    Maximal PSA change after DSTP3086S ADC treatment vs. baselinePearson r = −0.496, P = 0.576 (n = 16)
    Highest immunohistochemistry value (archival or fresh) vs. SUVmaxSpearman r = 0.37, P = 0.12 (n = 19)
    Immunohistochemistry value for fresh tissue vs. SUVmaxSpearman r = 0.0976, P = 0.803 (n = 6)
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Imaging Findings by Modality in Bone or Soft-Tissue Lesions (n = 19 Patients)

    Bone lesionsSoft-tissue lesions
    AgentBone scan+Bone scan−CT+CT−CIM+CIM−CT+CT−Total
    89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A+43382253262*4437292938
    89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A−21748160105265NA2NA
    Total650130413367708721129
    • ↵* 24 sites identified on 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A were not in CT field of view; 18 bone scan sites were not in CT field of view.

    • CIM = conventional imaging modality.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 11
November 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody
Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Bernard M. Fine, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Steven M. Larson, Stephen E. Fleming, Josef J. Fox, Sarah M. Cheal, Joseph A. O’Donoghue, Shutian Ruan, Govind Ragupathi, Serge K. Lyashchenko, John L. Humm, Howard I. Scher, Mithat Gönen, Simon P. Williams, Daniel C. Danila, Michael J. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, 60 (11) 1517-1523; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222844

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody
Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Bernard M. Fine, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Steven M. Larson, Stephen E. Fleming, Josef J. Fox, Sarah M. Cheal, Joseph A. O’Donoghue, Shutian Ruan, Govind Ragupathi, Serge K. Lyashchenko, John L. Humm, Howard I. Scher, Mithat Gönen, Simon P. Williams, Daniel C. Danila, Michael J. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, 60 (11) 1517-1523; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222844
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • KEY POINTS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Circulating Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Predict Clinical Outcomes in 11C Choline-identified Oligometastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
  • Cryo-electron microscopy structure and potential enzymatic function of human six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in non-cutaneous melanomas.
  • The role of Lymphoscintigraphy in Breast Cancer Reccurence
  • Utility of bone scans in patients with RCC
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • STEAP1
  • 89Zr
  • antibody
  • positron
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire