Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

[18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 166 Patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy

Frederik Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Tobias Maurer, Gregor Habl, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Klaus Kopka, Oliver Neels, Wolfgang Weber, Markus Schwaiger and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 459;
Frederik Giesel
2Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karina Knorr
4Department of Nuclear Medicine Technical University of Munich (TUM) Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Spohn
2Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Maurer
6Department of Urology Technical University of Munich (TUM) Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregor Habl
5Department of Radiation Oncology Technical University of Munich (TUM) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
2Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
2Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Kopka
1Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Neels
1Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Weber
3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schwaiger
4Department of Nuclear Medicine Technical University of Munich (TUM) Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
4Department of Nuclear Medicine Technical University of Munich (TUM) Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

459

Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted PET-imaging has gained significant interest in staging and restaging of prostate cancer during the last years. Most published studies investigate the diagnostic potential of Ga-labeled PSMA-agents. [18F]PSMA-1007 is a novel PSMA-ligand with excellent preclinical characteristics and the lack of urinary excretion. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 in biochemical recurrence.

Methods: 166 patients from two center with BCR after radical prostatectomy were evaluated in a retrospective analysis. Patients who have already received second line androgen deprivation therapy and/or chemotherapy were excluded. The median PSA-level was 1.21 ng/ml (range: 0.21-107.7 ng/mL). All patients underwent a PSMA-PET/CT after injection of 4 MBq [18F]PSMA-1007 per kg BW at 60-120 min post injection. The detection rates were correlated with PSA-level.

Results: 149 patients (89.8.1%) patients showed pathological findings in [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT. The detection rates were 72.7% (24/33), 84.4% (27/32), 97.5% (39/40) and 96.7% (59/61) at PSA-levels of 0.2 to<0.5 ng/ml, 0.5 to<1 ng/ml, 1 to<2 ng/ml and ≥2ng/ml, respectively (Figure-1). [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT revealed local recurrence in 23.7% (40) patients. Lymph node metastases were present in the pelvis in 43.2% (73), in the retroperitoneum in 24.9% (42) and supradiaphragmatic location in 12.4% (21) patients. Bone and visceral metastases were detected in 50.3% (85) and 5.3% (9) patients.

Conclusions: [18F]PSMA-1007PET/CT offers superb detection rates in BCR after radical prostatectomy with a trend towards higher efficacy compared to data published in literature for Ga-labelled PSMA-radioligands.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
[18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 166 Patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
[18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 166 Patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy
Frederik Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Tobias Maurer, Gregor Habl, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Klaus Kopka, Oliver Neels, Wolfgang Weber, Markus Schwaiger, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 459;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
[18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 166 Patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy
Frederik Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Tobias Maurer, Gregor Habl, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Klaus Kopka, Oliver Neels, Wolfgang Weber, Markus Schwaiger, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 459;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Cancer Imaging II

  • 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in Patients with Negative Conventional Imaging
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with contraindications to or negative mpMRI
Show more Prostate Cancer Imaging II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire