Article Figures & Data
Tables
Table 1: Univariate Cox regression ([asterisk] indicates significance after correction for multiple testing)
OS PFS EFS Parameters HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value Num. of liver mets 2.71 (1.44-5.12) 0.0021[asterisk] 2.61 (1.18-5.79) 0.018 2.42 (1.32-4.42) 0.0042 MTV 2.62 (1.38-4.98) 0.0034[asterisk] 1.96 (0.87-4.41) 0.11 2.29 (1.23-4.24) 0.0086 TLG 2.62 (1.38-4.98) 0.0034[asterisk] 1.96 (0.87-4.41) 0.11 2.29 (1.23-4.24) 0.0086 SUVpeak 2.05 (1.09-3.86) Table 2: Final multivariate Cox regression model for OS, PFS and EFS
Survival Analysis Metrics in the model HR(95% CI) p-value OS MTV,Num. of liver mets 3.34(1.68-6.65) 0.0006 PFS heterogeneity features (described in figure caption): V10-90,Histogram COV,V90 4.42(1.82-10.7) 0.0010 EFS MTV,Num. of liver mets 2.69(1.42-5.11) 0.0024
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.