Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleEndocrinology

Measurement of Brown Adipose Tissue Activity Using Microwave Radiometry and 18F-FDG PET/CT

John P. Crandall, Joo H. O, Prateek Gajwani, Jeffrey P. Leal, Daniel D. Mawhinney, Fred Sterzer and Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2018, 59 (8) 1243-1248; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.204339
John P. Crandall
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joo H. O
2Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prateek Gajwani
3Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey P. Leal
3Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel D. Mawhinney
4MMTC, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Sterzer
4MMTC, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Wahl
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
3Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Microwave radiometry system used in this study.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    BAT maximization (A) and minimization (B) protocols. During maximization, each participant was exposed to cold for about 2 h before PET/CT imaging. Minimization protocol was organized in same way, with 20-mg dose of propranolol replacing start of cold exposure. MRAD = microwave radiometry.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Diagram showing representative points at which radiometry data were collected. Surgical marker was used to draw sets of collection points, including multiple points on both sides of neck. Same grid was drawn during both maximization and minimization protocols, and photograph was taken for comparison with PET/CT images.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Representative BAT maximization (A) and minimization (B) 18F-FDG PET images (anterior maximum-intensity projections). Extensive BAT activity is seen after maximization, but no activity is seen after minimization 8 d later. Normal activity in brain, salivary glands, heart, and bladder is consistent between the two images.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Comparison of radiometry measurements between BAT maximization (A) and minimization (B) studies. Mean measurements at data collection points over active BAT differ significantly from those over inactive BAT during maximization but not during minimization. Same data collection points were measured in both studies.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Receiver-operating-characteristic curve. Using 18F-FDG PET/CT as gold standard, area under curve was 0.88 (P = 0.003). At difference cutoff of 0.48 (i.e., difference between BAT maximization and minimization protocols at each data collection point), radiometry sensitivity and specificity for detecting activated BAT were 72.7% and 90.9%, respectively, and likelihood ratio was 8.0.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Participant Characteristics

    CharacteristicData
    Sex (n)
     Male2
     Female17
    Age (y)
     Mean ± SD24.8 ± 2.9
     Range21–32
    Body mass (kg)
     Mean ± SD56.5 ± 4.6
     Range48.0–63.0
    Height (m)
     Mean ± SD1.7 ± 0.1
     Range1.6–1.8
    Body mass index (kg/m2)
     Mean ± SD19.7 ± 1.3
     Range17.0–23.1
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 8
August 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurement of Brown Adipose Tissue Activity Using Microwave Radiometry and 18F-FDG PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Measurement of Brown Adipose Tissue Activity Using Microwave Radiometry and 18F-FDG PET/CT
John P. Crandall, Joo H. O, Prateek Gajwani, Jeffrey P. Leal, Daniel D. Mawhinney, Fred Sterzer, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2018, 59 (8) 1243-1248; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.204339

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measurement of Brown Adipose Tissue Activity Using Microwave Radiometry and 18F-FDG PET/CT
John P. Crandall, Joo H. O, Prateek Gajwani, Jeffrey P. Leal, Daniel D. Mawhinney, Fred Sterzer, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2018, 59 (8) 1243-1248; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.204339
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Endocrinology

  • Assessment and Comparison of 18F-Fluorocholine PET and 99mTc-Sestamibi Scans in Identifying Parathyroid Adenomas: A Metaanalysis
  • Targeted Optical Imaging of the Glucagonlike Peptide 1 Receptor Using Exendin-4-IRDye 800CW
  • 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Superior Diagnostic Performance to Conventional Scintigraphic Imaging for Localization of Hyperfunctioning Parathyroid Glands
Show more Endocrinology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-FDG
  • Brown adipose tissue
  • microwave radiometry
  • Thermogenesis
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire