Abstract
109
Objectives: For patients undergoing routine oncologic and non-oncologic bone imaging, consistent qualitative and accurate quantitative assessment of sodium fluoride-18 (18F)-avid osteoblastic lesions is essential. Fluoride-18 is a PET radionuclide which forms chemical complexes at sites of increased bone turnover such as malignant/metastatic osteoblastic lesions. A recent technology innovation has led to the replacement of conventional photomultiplier tubes in the PET gantry with next-generation, solid-state, digital photon counting PET detectors (dPET). This new dPET detector technology has the potential to improve 18F PET bone imaging using higher definition reconstruction (i.e., decreasing voxel volumes). The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of dPET/CT technology in quantifying 18F-avid osteoblastic tumor burden using standard and higher definition image reconstructions.
Methods: In an ongoing clinical trial, 9 patients with metastatic genitourinary cancers underwent same-day sequential FDG and 18F PET/CT utilizing a pre-commercial release dPET/CT system (Vereos, Philips). Whole-body dPET/CT imaging was first performed using a target 185 MBq FDG dose 60 min p.i.. Immediately following the FDG dPET imaging, a target dose of 130 MBq Na18F was administered and repeat whole-body dPET/CT imaging was performed after another 60 min p.i.. Digital PET images were reconstructed using Time-of-Flight with different voxel volumes 4x4x4 mm3 (Standard Definition), 2x2x2 mm3 (High Definition), and 1x1x1 mm3 (Ultra-High Definition). A reader panel assessed both FDG and 18F image data sets to identify only 18F-avid (and not FDG-avid) osteoblastic tumor lesions. In addition, threshold based semi-automated isocontouring of these 18F-avid lesions was performed using a MIM Vista workstation and the following metrics were extracted: highest SUVmax (hSUVmax), average of SUVmax value, fluoride volume (FV) and total lesion fluoride (TLF).
Results: All 54 data sets were evaluable. UHD dPET imaging for both FDG and 18F were rated best for image quality. Among the patients, there was a variable amount of osteoblastic tumor burden. Of the 9 patients, 5 had 18F-avid osteoblastic lesions with no associated FDG uptake. Of these, 4 had 8 discrete lesions whereas 1 had disseminated osteoblastic metastatic disease. On average, hSUVmax increased by 13% when lesions were evaluated using high definition reconstructions and 27% for ultra-high definition reconstructions. Similarly, lesion FV increased by 11% for high definition and 28% for ultra-high definition reconstructions. In addition, there were slight increases in the average SUVmax and TLF for lesions at higher definition reconstructions.
Conclusion: This study presents the initial demonstration of ultra-high definition dPET imaging for 18F-avid osteoblastic lesions. This dPET technology enables higher definition reconstructions and appears to advance image quality and quantitative precision of 18F PET bone imaging by reducing partial volume effects. As a consequence, the use of fixed threshold-based quantitative methodologies with higher definition PET reconstruction will likely contribute to true increases in both SUV and volume metrics when compared with standard definition PET reconstruction. Research Support: NCI R01CA195513, ODSA TECH 13-060, TECH 10-012, and TECH 09-028