Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Comparison of Empiric Versus Whole-Body/-Blood Clearance Dosimetry–Based Approach to Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients with Metastases from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Désirée Deandreis, Carole Rubino, Hernan Tala, Sophie Leboulleux, Marie Terroir, Eric Baudin, Steve Larson, James A. Fagin, Martin Schlumberger and R. Michael Tuttle
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 717-722; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.179606
Désirée Deandreis
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carole Rubino
2CESP (Centre d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique) U1018, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hernan Tala
3Endocrinology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie Leboulleux
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Terroir
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Baudin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Larson
4Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James A. Fagin
5Endocrinology Service and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Schlumberger
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Michael Tuttle
3Endocrinology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    OS estimated from time of diagnosis of metastases until patient last follow-up or death.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    OS according to age and extent of metastases estimated from time of diagnosis of metastases until patient last follow-up or death.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical Characteristics of Patient Population

    CharacteristicGR (n = 231)MSKCC (n = 121)GR + MSKCC (n = 352)P
    Sex (%)
     Female153 (66)68 (56)*221 (63)0.09
    Primary thyroid tumor
     Median age at diagnosis (y)40 (range, 5–90)49 (range, 7–77)42 (range, 5–90)0.03
    Histology (%)
     Follicular thyroid carcinoma74 (32.0)32 (26.5)106 (30.1)
     Papillary thyroid carcinoma156 (67.5)89 (73.5)245 (69.6)Not significant
     Other1 (0.3)01 (0.3)
    Distant metastases
     Median age at diagnosis (y)42 (range, 6–90)53 (range, 10–80)46 (range, 6–90)<0.01
     Median year of diagnosis1994 (range, 1981–2007)2000 (range, 1983–2008)1997 (range, 1981–2008)<0.0001
     Synchronous metastases (%)†143 (61.9)67 (55.4)210 (59.7)Not significant
    Site (%)
     Lung139 (60.2)66 (54.6)205 (58.2)
     Bone55 (23.8)29 (24.0)84 (23.9)Not significant
     Lung and bone (± others)37 (16.0)26 (21.5)63 (17.9)
    Metastases size (%)
     Macronodular lung metastases37 (21.5)31 (35.6)68 (26.3)0.02
     Multiple bone lesions62 (68.9)41 (77.4)103 (72.0)Not significant
    Extent of metastases‡
     Category 169 (29.9)14 (11.6)83 (23.6)
     Category 266 (28.6)43 (35.5)109 (31.0)<0.001
     Category 396 (41.6)64 (52.9)160 (45.4)
    • ↵* Not known, 2 patients.

    • ↵† 6 mo before or after primary tumor diagnosis.

    • ↵‡ According to Durante classification (8).

    • Category 1 = patients with metastases on 131I WB scan but with normal radiologic imaging; category 2 = patients with micronodular lung metastases defined radiologically < 1 cm or with a single bone metastasis identified radiologically; category 3 = macronodular lung metastases or multiple bone metastases or both bone and lung metastases.

    • Data in parentheses are percentages unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Median Number of 131I Treatments, Median Administered Activity, and Median Cumulative Activity (GBq) According to Patient Group

    Group 1 (n = 106)Group 2 (n = 114)Group 3 (n = 132)
    ParameterGR (n = 79)MSKCC (n = 27)GR (n = 74)MSKCC (n = 40)GR (n = 78)MSKCC (n = 54)
    5-y OS0.96 (95% CI, 0.88–0.99)0.96 (95% CI, 0.73–0.99)0.92 (95% CI, 0.83–0.97)0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–0.94)0.70 (95% CI, 0.58–0.80)0.65 (95% CI, 0.50–0.77)
    131I treatment
     Median number4 (1–14)2 (1–7)4 (1–14)3 (1–9)4 (1–13)3 (1–8)
     Median administered activity (GBq)3.7 (1.4–5.2)7.5 (2.7–14.1)3.7 (1.1–8.7)8.9 (4.6–18.6)3.7 (1.8–11.1)10.6 (3.7–16.7)
     Median cumulative activity (GBq)14.8 (3.7–39.2)17.2 (2.7–56.4)14.8 (2.2–52.5)23.1 (5.5–112)14.8 (1.8–52.5)29.8 (3.7–83.9)
    • Group 1 = patients aged < 40 y with no visible disease on cross-sectional imaging, micronodular lung metastases or single bone lesion; group 2 = patients aged < 40 y with either macrometastases or patients aged > 40 y with micrometastases; group 3 = patients aged > 40 y with lung macrometastases or multiple bone metastases (8).

    • Data in parentheses are ranges unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Predicting OS

    FactorNo. of subjects/deathsCrude RRPAdjusted RRP
    Sex
     Male129/571 (ref)<0.0011 (ref)<0.001
     Female221/550.42 (0.29–0.62)0.49 (0.33–0.74)
    Age at the diagnosis of distant metastasis (y)
     0–2980/31 (ref)1 (ref)
     30–3954/116.43 (1.79–23.10)4.54 (1.24–16.61)
     40–4956/189.87 (2.91–33.52)<0.00017.65 (2.22–26.32)<0.0001
     50–5970/3121.57 (6.55–71.10)11.49 (3.33–39.59)
     60–6957/3123.60 (7.15–77.95)13.18 (3.83–45.31)
     70–9035/1842.88 (12.39–148.37)23.03 (6.24–85.08)
    Extent of metastases
     Category 183/81 (ref)1 (ref)
     Category 2109/313.65 (1.68–7.94)<0.0012.71 (1.22–6.03)<0.01
     Category 3160/738.43 (4.04–17.58)3.49 (1.56–7.81)
    Site of metastases
     Lung205/511 (ref)1 (ref)
     Bone84/322.17 (1.38–3.39)<0.0011.33 (0.77–2.31)0.24
     Lung and bone ± other63/293.58 (2.24–5.72)1.63 (0.92–2.91)
    Histology
     Papillary thyroid carcinoma245/721 (ref)1 (ref)
     Follicular thyroid carcinoma107/401.61 (1.09–2.39)0.020.67 (0.42–1.07)0.09
    Center
     GR231/681 (ref)1 (ref)
     MSKCC121/441.77 (1.20–2.62)0.011.41 (0.87–2.29)0.16
    • ref = reference; Category 1 = patients with metastases on 131I WB scan but with normal radiologic imaging; category 2 = patients with micronodular lung metastases defined radiologically < 1 cm or with a single bone metastasis identified radiologically; category 3 = macronodular lung metastases or multiple bone metastases or both bone and lung metastases.

    • Data in parentheses are 95% CIs.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 5
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Empiric Versus Whole-Body/-Blood Clearance Dosimetry–Based Approach to Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients with Metastases from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Empiric Versus Whole-Body/-Blood Clearance Dosimetry–Based Approach to Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients with Metastases from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Désirée Deandreis, Carole Rubino, Hernan Tala, Sophie Leboulleux, Marie Terroir, Eric Baudin, Steve Larson, James A. Fagin, Martin Schlumberger, R. Michael Tuttle
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 717-722; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179606

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Empiric Versus Whole-Body/-Blood Clearance Dosimetry–Based Approach to Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients with Metastases from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Désirée Deandreis, Carole Rubino, Hernan Tala, Sophie Leboulleux, Marie Terroir, Eric Baudin, Steve Larson, James A. Fagin, Martin Schlumberger, R. Michael Tuttle
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 717-722; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179606
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Prescribed Activity of 131I Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Nuclear Medicine in the Evaluation and Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
  • Treatment of refractory thyroid cancer
  • Fixed 3.7-GBq 131I Activity for Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Therapy Ignores Science and History
  • Reply: Fixed 3.7-GBq 131I Activity for Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Therapy Ignores Science and History
  • Prescribed Activity of 131I Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
  • Reply: Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details
  • Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • The diagnostic role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the detection of neuroendocrine tumors
  • Utility of bone scans in patients with RCC
  • Disseminated xanthogranulomatous oophoritis mimicking malignancy on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • Detection of Early Progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Bipolar Androgen Therapy
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • endocrine
  • oncology
  • radionuclide therapy
  • dosimetry
  • radioactive iodine
  • thyroid cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire