Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticlePhysics/Instrumentation

Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging as a Modality to Evaluate Antibody-Based PET Radiotracers

Jimson W. D’Souza, Harvey Hensley, Mohan Doss, Charles Beigarten, Michael Torgov, Tove Olafsen, Jian Q. Yu and Matthew K. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2017, 58 (1) 175-180; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.178780
Jimson W. D’Souza
1Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harvey Hensley
1Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohan Doss
1Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Beigarten
3ImaginAb Inc., Inglewood, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Torgov
3ImaginAb Inc., Inglewood, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tove Olafsen
3ImaginAb Inc., Inglewood, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Q. Yu
1Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew K. Robinson
1Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Characterization of NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. (A) IgG and Mb formats of anti-PSMA huJ591 antibody were analyzed by gel electrophoresis under nonreducing (NR) and reducing (R) conditions before and after conjugation of NODAGA. (B) Competition cell binding experiments demonstrate that conjugation of NODAGA did not significantly disrupt ability of either PSMA-IgG or PSMA-Mb to bind cell surface PSMA. (C) 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb bind selectively to PSMA-positive cells.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    CLI with 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. (A) CLI-based evaluation of 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. Luminescence was scaled to allow for direct comparison across time course. (B) Average tumor-to-background ratios across entire time course for PSMA-positive (PSMA+) and PSMA-negative (PSMA–) tumors with both radiotracers. (C) Average radiance in PSMA+ and PSMA– tumors at time of peak uptake for 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    CLI. Time course analysis of representative mouse imaged with either 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG (top) or 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb (bottom). Scales were optimized at each time point to provide for maximum contrast between 22Rv1 PSMA-positive (PSMA+) (right shoulder) and PC-3 PSMA-negative (PSMA–) (left shoulder) tumors. Regions of interest over tumor and background areas are shown as ellipses in first panels of each image set.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    PET imaging with 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. (A) PET/CT fusion images of representative mice at defined time points. Both 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb exhibited selective uptake into PSMA-positive (PSMA+) CWR22Rv1 tumor xenografts. (B) %ID of radiotracers in PSMA+ and PSMA-negative (PSMA–) tumor xenografts over time as quantified by PET imaging. (C) PET-based uptake in PSMA+ and PSMA– tumors at time of peak uptake for 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. K = kidneys; L = liver.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Biodistribution of 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb. (A) Biodistribution of 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG and 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb radiotracers at 72 and 48 h after injection, respectively, demonstrating statistically significant selective uptake into CWR22Rv1 PSMA-positive (PSMA+) vs. PC-3 PSMA-negative (PSMA–) tumors. (B) 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-Mb cleared more rapidly from blood than 64Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-IgG.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 1
January 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging as a Modality to Evaluate Antibody-Based PET Radiotracers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging as a Modality to Evaluate Antibody-Based PET Radiotracers
Jimson W. D’Souza, Harvey Hensley, Mohan Doss, Charles Beigarten, Michael Torgov, Tove Olafsen, Jian Q. Yu, Matthew K. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2017, 58 (1) 175-180; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178780

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging as a Modality to Evaluate Antibody-Based PET Radiotracers
Jimson W. D’Souza, Harvey Hensley, Mohan Doss, Charles Beigarten, Michael Torgov, Tove Olafsen, Jian Q. Yu, Matthew K. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2017, 58 (1) 175-180; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178780
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Detection of Shortwave-Infrared Cerenkov Luminescence from Medical Isotopes
  • Design of Cerenkov Radiation-Assisted Photoactivation of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation for Cancer Treatment
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Zero-Echo-Time and Dixon Deep Pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): Direct Generation of Pseudo-CT Images for Pelvic PET/MRI Attenuation Correction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Multiparametric MRI
  • Comparison of PET/CT with Sequential PET/MRI Using an MR-Compatible Mobile PET System
  • PET Imaging Stability Measurements During Simultaneous Pulsing of Aggressive MR Sequences on the SIGNA PET/MR System
Show more Physics/Instrumentation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging (CLI)
  • immunoPET
  • antibody
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire