Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Basic Science Track

Exploiting the DNA damage response to improve peptide receptor radionuclide therapy outcome

Julie Nonnekens, Melissa van Kranenburg, Dik C. Van Gent and Marion de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1387;
Julie Nonnekens
1Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
2Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa van Kranenburg
1Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
2Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dik C. Van Gent
1Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
2Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marion de Jong
3Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1387

Objectives Targeted molecular imaging & treatment (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues is successfully applied in clinical trials. PRRT of metastasized NETs results in improved patient outcome, but cure is reached in low percentages only. To further improve treatment outcome, we investigated DNA damaging effects of PRRT with the aim to enhance these effects through modulation of the DNA damage response. We aimed specifically to sensitize tumor cells without further damage to healthy tissues using PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Although PRRT induces cytotoxic double strand breaks (DSBs), the majority of the induced lesions are single strand breaks (SSBs) that require PARP activity for repair. When these breaks are not repaired efficiently (by using PARPi), they cause replication fork arrest and more difficult to repair DSB formation in replicating cells.

Methods Somatostatin receptor-positive tumor cells were incubated with increasing doses of 177Lu-[DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate (DOTA-TATE), followed by non-radionuclide chases with and without PARPi. Cells were fixed and fluorescently stained with antibodies to visualize accumulation of DNA repair proteins to the DSBs and apoptosis. Proliferation was measured using fluorescent Click-iT labeling and sulforhodamine B. Cellular survival was measured using colony assay.

Results Using several molecular biological and fluorescent microscopy techniques, we have characterized the induced DNA damage and DNA damage response after PRRT. Our results show that after PRRT tumor cells showed accumulation of the DSB repair protein 53BP1 in so-called foci, indicating the induction and ongoing repair of DSBs. These foci were detectable for up to 3 days after treatment. In contrast, treatment with 177Lu-DTPA caused transient DSBs that were no longer detectable after 1 day. Interestingly, addition of PARPi led to increased and prolonged DNA damage (up to 6 days), specifically in replicating cells. This was also confirmed by the higher percentage of cells with chromosomal damage, shown by micronuclei. PRRT eradicated cells in a dose dependent manner and cell killing (via apoptosis) was strongly enhanced by PARPi.

Conclusions In conclusion, we show that PRRT triggers the DNA damage response by producing DSBs in preclinical models. Through modulation of the DNA damage response with PARPi, we were able to enhance the DNA-damaging effects of PRRT, specifically in replicating cells. We expect that our results will eventually improve the current PRRT outcome, leading to increased patient survival rates.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploiting the DNA damage response to improve peptide receptor radionuclide therapy outcome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Exploiting the DNA damage response to improve peptide receptor radionuclide therapy outcome
Julie Nonnekens, Melissa van Kranenburg, Dik C. Van Gent, Marion de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1387;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Exploiting the DNA damage response to improve peptide receptor radionuclide therapy outcome
Julie Nonnekens, Melissa van Kranenburg, Dik C. Van Gent, Marion de Jong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1387;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Basic Science Track

  • Imaging adult glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR
  • Evaluation of L-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-Tryptophan for PET Imaging of Cancer
  • Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with 225Ac-proteus-DOTA hapten.
Show more Oncology, Basic Science Track

MTA I: Basic Science Posters

  • In Vivo PET/CT neuroimaging of radiolabeled nanocarriers following intranasal drug delivery (INDD): Validation using Ex Vivo PET/CT, gamma counting and autoradiography.
  • 18F-ML10 PET/CT demonstrates therapy-induced apoptosis in murine pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Evaluating chemotherapy response on rabbit VX2 lung tumor model by liquid biopsy and function imaging.
Show more MTA I: Basic Science Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire