Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Prospective Study Evaluating Na18F PET/CT in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Andrea B. Apolo, Liza Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Esther Mena, Joseph W. Kim, Jong C. Park, Anna Alikhani, Yolanda Y. McKinney, Juanita Weaver, Baris Turkbey, Howard L. Parnes, Lauren V. Wood, Ravi A. Madan, James L. Gulley, William L. Dahut, Karen A. Kurdziel and Peter L. Choyke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2016, 57 (6) 886-892; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.166512
Andrea B. Apolo
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liza Lindenberg
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna H. Shih
3Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther Mena
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph W. Kim
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jong C. Park
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Alikhani
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yolanda Y. McKinney
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juanita Weaver
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
4Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baris Turkbey
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard L. Parnes
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren V. Wood
5Vaccine Branch, Clinical Trials Team, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi A. Madan
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James L. Gulley
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William L. Dahut
1Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen A. Kurdziel
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter L. Choyke
2Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) Progressive disease on Na18F PET/CT in 67-y-old man with postdocetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose PSA level increased on treatment with abiraterone acetate (6 mo) and cabazitaxel (12 mo). Sequential Na18F PET/CT scans detected multiple new skeletal lesions. Image intensities were equally adjusted. (B) Improved disease on Na18F PET/CT in 66-y-old man with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had PSA response to docetaxel chemotherapy. Sequential Na18F PET/CT scans showed significant decrease in uptake in right pelvic skeletal lesion. Image intensities were equally adjusted.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Number of lesions on Na18F PET/CT vs. 99mTc-BS.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    99mTc-BS and Na18F PET/CT in 74-y-old man with high-risk prostate cancer. 99mTc-BS shows right rib lesions categorized as indeterminate (blue arrows). Na18F PET/CT confirms lesions as malignant and shows additional malignant lesions in skull, ribs, and pelvis (red arrows). Other uptake (green arrow) is consistent with degenerative change. MDP = methylene diphosphonate.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Incidental finding of fibrous dysplasia on Na18F PET/CT. Right nasal bone appears characteristically opaque and expansile. Left image is axial CT scan of skull in bone window; right image is frontal maximum-intensity-projection Na18F PET/CT scan of skull.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

    Known bone metastases at enrollment
    CharacteristicNegative (n = 30)Positive (n = 30)
    Age (y)
     Median6564.5
     Range43–7944–79
    Baseline PSA (ng/mL)
     Median10.979.93
     Range0.01–1900.1–593
    Gleason score
     41 (3%)0
     64 (13%)3 (10%)
     77 (23%)10 (33%)
     88 (27%)5 (17%)
     99 (30%)11 (37%)
     1001 (3%)
    On treatment at NIH
     Yes6 (20%)11 (37%)
     No24 (80%)19 (63%)
    Managed at NIH multidisciplinary clinic
     Yes10 (33%)2 (7%)
     No20 (66%)28 (93%)
    Primary therapy
     Radical prostatectomy14 (47%)13 (43%)
     External-beam radiation8 (26%)7 (23%)
     Brachytherapy2 (7%)0
    Castration status
     Sensitive21 (70%)13 (43%)
     Resistant9 (30%)17 (57%)
    Therapy while on study
     GnRH agonist/antagonist (leuprorelin/degarelix)2826
     Antiandrogen (bicalutamide, nilutamide)1413
     Ketoconazole14
     Enzalutamide01
     Abiraterone01
     Docetaxel, bevacizumab, lenalidomide, prednisone010
     Taxane02
     Bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid/dasatinib)36
     Sipuleucel-T03
     Vaccine study (TARP, Prostvac [Bavarian Nordic])34
     TRC105 (TRACON Pharmaceuticals)11
     Radiation44
    • NIH = National Institutes of Health; GnRH = gonadotropin-releasing hormone; TARP, T-cell receptor γ alternate reading frame protein.

    • Total number of patients is 60. Data are number of patients, unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Distribution of Malignant Bone Metastases on Na18F PET/CT

    LocationScans with ≥1 lesion
    Skull19 (13%)
    Spine34 (24%)
    Pelvic bones40 (28%)
    Thorax34 (24%)
    Long bones15 (11%)
    Superscan8
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Number of Na18F PET/CT Lesions with Respect to Clinical Impression at Each Time Point

    Time pointDataP
    BaselineArm 1, 5 (0–52)Arm 2, 0 (0–4)<0.0001
    Clinical impression at 6 moImproved, 3 (0–29)Stable, 2 (0–24)Progressed, 14 (2–65)0.0078
    Clinical impression at 12 moImproved, 6 (1–29)Stable, 1 (0–26)Progressed, 25 (0–59)0.0029
    • Total number of lesions is 60. Data are median number of lesions, followed by range in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Detection of Lesions by Na18F PET/CT and 99mTc-BS in Patient-Based Analysis

    99mTc-BS
    Na18F PET/CTPositiveIndeterminateNegative
    Positive37146
    Indeterminate030
    Negative125
    • Total number of scans is 68.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 6
June 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prospective Study Evaluating Na18F PET/CT in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prospective Study Evaluating Na18F PET/CT in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer
Andrea B. Apolo, Liza Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Esther Mena, Joseph W. Kim, Jong C. Park, Anna Alikhani, Yolanda Y. McKinney, Juanita Weaver, Baris Turkbey, Howard L. Parnes, Lauren V. Wood, Ravi A. Madan, James L. Gulley, William L. Dahut, Karen A. Kurdziel, Peter L. Choyke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2016, 57 (6) 886-892; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166512

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prospective Study Evaluating Na18F PET/CT in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer
Andrea B. Apolo, Liza Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Esther Mena, Joseph W. Kim, Jong C. Park, Anna Alikhani, Yolanda Y. McKinney, Juanita Weaver, Baris Turkbey, Howard L. Parnes, Lauren V. Wood, Ravi A. Madan, James L. Gulley, William L. Dahut, Karen A. Kurdziel, Peter L. Choyke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2016, 57 (6) 886-892; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166512
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
  • Prospective Study of Serial 18F-FDG PET and 18F-Fluoride PET to Predict Time to Skeletal-Related Events, Time to Progression, and Survival in Patients with Bone-Dominant Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Hospice Admission and Survival After 18F-Fluoride PET Performed for Evaluation of Osseous Metastatic Disease in the National Oncologic PET Registry
  • David Versus the Goliaths for the Detection of Bone Metastases
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • NaF PET/CT
  • sodium fluoride
  • bone metastases
  • nuclear imaging in prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire