Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Utilizing High-Energy γ-Photons for High-Resolution 213Bi SPECT in Mice

Jan de Swart, Ho Sze Chan, Marlies C. Goorden, Alfred Morgenstern, Frank Bruchertseifer, Freek J. Beekman, Marion de Jong and Mark W. Konijnenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2016, 57 (3) 486-492; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.157685
Jan de Swart
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ho Sze Chan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marlies C. Goorden
2Section Radiation, Detection and Medical Imaging, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfred Morgenstern
3European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Bruchertseifer
3European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Freek J. Beekman
2Section Radiation, Detection and Medical Imaging, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
4MIlabs B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands
5Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marion de Jong
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
6Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark W. Konijnenberg
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    RCs for syringe initially filled with 86.2 MBq of 213Bi (in 2.0 mL) scanned in 15 frames of 30 min. Results were fitted with a horizontal line when both residuals were normally distributed (D’Agostini–Pearson test) and showed no significant systematic deviation (Runs test). Open symbols indicate excluded RC values. Some data points at low-activity concentrations did not fall within y-axis boundaries.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    RCs for syringe initially filled with 67.69 MBq of 213Bi (in 2.0 mL) scanned in 45 frames of 5 min. Results were fitted with horizontal line when both residuals were normally distributed (D’Agostini–Pearson test) and showed no significant systematic deviation (Runs test). Open symbols indicate excluded RC values. Some data points at low-activity concentrations did not fall within y-axis boundaries. Data for first 13 frames were omitted from graph but were included in averaging.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Resolution phantom images of 213Bi SPECT. Phantom has 6 segments containing capillary diameters of 1.5, 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, and 0.7 mm. Images show reconstructions for different energy window settings summed over 5 slices (2 mm in total).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A–D) Profiles through 0.7-, 0.8-, 0.9-, and 1.2-mm rods for single 79 and 440 keV and combined 79 keV/440 keV energy windows. (E and F) Contrast and contrast-to-noise curves for different rod sizes.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Ex vivo image of 3.0 MBq of [213Bi-DOTA,Tyr3]-octreotate injected in nude mouse. (Top to bottom) Maximum-intensity-projection images reconstructed at 79 keV, 440 keV, and both energy windows. Numbers in color table indicate radioactivity concentration in MBq/mL.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    In vivo mouse maximum-intensity-projection images with 7.4 MBq of 213Bi-DTPA. Images were reconstructed using combined 79 keV/440 keV photopeak setting. In 9 consecutive 5-min frames, kidneys show up in each frame, initially showing ureters at top of image with gradually distribution to renal cortices and filling of bladder. Numbers in color table indicate radioactivity concentration in MBq/mL.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Kinetic modeling of 213Bi-DTPA in urinary bladder and kidneys. In decay-corrected data (A), bladder activity is fit by single exponential with half-life of 11 ± 2 min (effective half-life [Teff] = 15 min). Kidneys did not show clearance, whereas in uncorrected data (B) renal clearance proceeded with Teff of 52 ± 10 min. Images were reconstructed from combined 79 keV/440 keV photopeaks.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Results from Measurements of 213Bi-Filled Phantoms

    Energy window79 keV440 keV79 + 440 keV
    RC 30-min frames (mean ± SE)1.03 ± 0.0071.04 ± 0.0071.04 ± 0.009
    Lower limit linearity, 30 min (MBq/mL)0.940.240.94
    RC 5-min frames (mean ± SE)0.93 ± 0.0071.00 ± 0.0031.01 ± 0.003
    Lower limit linearity, 5 min (MBq/mL)2.330.900.32
    FWHM, 0.7-mm rods (mm)1.1 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.3
    FWHM, 0.8-mm rods (mm)1.6 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.2
    FWHM, 0.9-mm rods (mm)1.4 ± 0.61.33 ± 0.141.29 ± 0.09
    FWHM, 1.0-mm rods (mm)1.4 ± 0.51.34 ± 0.291.29 ± 0.12
    FWHM, 1.2-mm rods (mm)1.6 ± 0.61.30 ± 0.141.25 ± 0.08
    FWHM, 1.5-mm rods (mm)2.0 ± 0.41.58 ± 0.141.61 ± 0.12

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 3
March 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utilizing High-Energy γ-Photons for High-Resolution 213Bi SPECT in Mice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Utilizing High-Energy γ-Photons for High-Resolution 213Bi SPECT in Mice
Jan de Swart, Ho Sze Chan, Marlies C. Goorden, Alfred Morgenstern, Frank Bruchertseifer, Freek J. Beekman, Marion de Jong, Mark W. Konijnenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2016, 57 (3) 486-492; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157685

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Utilizing High-Energy γ-Photons for High-Resolution 213Bi SPECT in Mice
Jan de Swart, Ho Sze Chan, Marlies C. Goorden, Alfred Morgenstern, Frank Bruchertseifer, Freek J. Beekman, Marion de Jong, Mark W. Konijnenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2016, 57 (3) 486-492; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157685
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cyclotron-Produced 132La as a PET Imaging Surrogate for Therapeutic 225Ac
  • First Whole-Body Three-Dimensional Tomographic Imaging of Alpha Particle Emitting Radium-223
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer
  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 213Bi
  • SPECT
  • ultra-high-energy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire