Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

A simple method of reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) exams. Voiding!

Stephanie Krause, Samuel Unzek, Chris Tollefson and William Pavlicek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2612;
Stephanie Krause
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Unzek
2Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Tollefson
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Pavlicek
3Medical Physics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2612

Objectives Patients and medical professionals are scrutinizing the need for diagnostic testing and how radiation exposure can be reduced. Technetium-99m tetrofosmin is one of the most common used tracers for perfusion in MPI studies. Published data states that 40% of tetrofosmin is excreted in the urine. Exposure time to the radiotracer is associated to the effects of radiation so by clearing the tracer from the body one may reduce these unwanted effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of techetium-99m (tetrofosmin) eliminated from the bladder in the first hours after injection as a simple method to reduce radiation exposure after an MPI study.

Methods In the current workflow in a nuclear cardiology laboratory for the purposes of improving image quality, patients are sent to eat and drink after the stress test prior to imaging. For this study, hydration was encouraged so patients would be able to void when they returned for their stress image acquisition. Radiation was measured at one meter from the patient with an ion chamber prior to their stress images with a full bladder and again after emptying their bladder. Patients who could not void were excluded.

Results Consecutive patients (n=98) measured an average of 10.6 mR/hr at one meter prior to voiding and 8.9 mR/hr a few minutes after voiding. This is a reduction of 16% in patients receiving an average of 41.6 mCi of Tc99m tetrofosmin (rest and stress) for their exam.

Conclusions Reduced radiation exposure to patients and the general public is an ongoing concern. Encouraging patient hydration and voiding will effectively reduce the dose from an MPI study both to the patient and the community. This method is simple and applicable to all laboratories that perform MPIs around the world. Small and technical changes like the one proposed in this study may add up considerably and result in a substantial reduction in unnecessary radiation exposure.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A simple method of reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) exams. Voiding!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A simple method of reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) exams. Voiding!
Stephanie Krause, Samuel Unzek, Chris Tollefson, William Pavlicek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2612;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A simple method of reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) exams. Voiding!
Stephanie Krause, Samuel Unzek, Chris Tollefson, William Pavlicek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2612;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • Evaluation of image quality in amplitude based respiratory-gating for PET/CT using motion phantom
  • Effects of a novel additional neck-shield and time of flight on quality of cerebral imaging in 15O-labeled gas inhalation study
  • A novel method for developing a standardized nuclear imaging protocol using 99mTc-PYP for identifying ATTR cardiac amyloid
Show more Technologist

Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

  • Quantitative accuracy of F-18 FDG injection compared among three automated infusion devices
  • Preparation method of radiation sensitive copolymer carrier for coating radiated nanoparticles and chemotherapy drugs
  • Comparison images between PET and SPECT of 90Y: A Monte-Carlo simulation study
Show more Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire