Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Comparison of two methods for semiquantitative evaluation of DaTSCAN

Jianhua Zhang, Esther Mena, Yan Fan, Rong Fu Wang, Melin Vranesic, Zoltan Mari and Zsolt Szabo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1759;
Jianhua Zhang
1Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther Mena
2Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Fan
1Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rong Fu Wang
1Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melin Vranesic
2Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zoltan Mari
2Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zsolt Szabo
2Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1759

Objectives Semiquantitative analysis as a supplement of visual assessment plays an important role in evaluation of DaTSCAN images. Our goal is to compare two semiquantitative methods for evaluation of DaTSCAN and assess their clinical value.

Methods Sixteen DaTSCAN studies in 11 patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and 5 control subjects performed between Jan 2011 and Apr 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Images were processed with two techniques: 1) Automated semiquantification based on the Brain Analysis Software (BRASS) and 2) Manual regions of interest using PMOD software. The occipital cortex served as reference tissue. Specific binding ratios of the entire striatum, the bilateral caudate nuclei, and the bilateral putamen to the occipital cortex were calculated as (striatum-reference)/reference. Correlations between all these striatal ratios and the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were calculated.

Results With Brass in controls the average ratios of left caudate, left putamen, right caudate, right putamen and entire striatum were 2.102, 1.934, 2.036, 1.810 and 1.971, while in the PD group they were 1.313, 0.961, 1.257, 0.913 and 1.111, respectively. The striatal binding ratios were significantly higher in the control group (P<0.05) except in the right caudate. With PMOD the average ratios of the left caudate, left putamen, right caudate, right putamen and entire striatum of controls were 2.547, 3.171, 2.546, 2.937 and 2.8 in controls, and 1.921, 1.491, 1.803, 1.473 and 1.452 in PD。Again, these differences were significant (P<0.05), except in the right caudate (P>0.05). UPDRS was higher in the PD group than in the control group (31.125 vs 3.8, P<0.05 ). The striatal ratios from both methods showed negative correlation with UPDRS (r:-0.562~-0.877, P<0.05).

Conclusions Semiquantitative evaluation of DaTSCAN with either BRASS or PMOD methods can differentiate PD from control subjects. The striatal ratios of both methods show negative correlation with the severity of PD

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of two methods for semiquantitative evaluation of DaTSCAN
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of two methods for semiquantitative evaluation of DaTSCAN
Jianhua Zhang, Esther Mena, Yan Fan, Rong Fu Wang, Melin Vranesic, Zoltan Mari, Zsolt Szabo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1759;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of two methods for semiquantitative evaluation of DaTSCAN
Jianhua Zhang, Esther Mena, Yan Fan, Rong Fu Wang, Melin Vranesic, Zoltan Mari, Zsolt Szabo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1759;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Comparison of radiation dosimetry estimates for [11C]L-Deprenyl and [11C]Clorgyline across species and with D for H isotopic substitution.
  • Direct VOI-dedicated voxelwise Patlak estimation for quantitative dynamic imaging
  • SPECT/CT and MR image registration for 123I-FP-CIT imaging
Show more MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire