Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer with a dedicated breast PET scanner

Kayo Nishimatsu, Yuji Nakamoto, Kanae Miyake, Shotaro Kanao and Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1302;
Kayo Nishimatsu
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuji Nakamoto
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kanae Miyake
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shotaro Kanao
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaori Togashi
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1302

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance in the detection of breast cancer of dedicated breast PET (dbPET), compared with that of conventional whole-body PET/CT (WB-PET/CT).

Methods A total of 163 females with breast cancer underwent a WB-PET/CT scan, followed by breast scanning with dbPET. The diagnostic performance of each scanner was calculated on a patient basis, breast basis, and lesion basis, according to the final pathological diagnosis. In addition, for patients who had surgical resection without neoadjuvant treatment, we evaluated detectability, based on the pT-stage.

Results In the 163 patients, 195 cancer foci in 321 breasts were analyzed in this study. Among them, 26 patients had multiple lesions in one breast and 6 patients had bilateral breast cancers. Patient-based, breast-based, and lesion-based sensitivities of dbPET were 88%, 88%, and 85%, respectively, and they were 95%, 95%, and 91% after excluding lesions outside the field of view (FOV). Meanwhile, those of WB-PET/CT were 95%, 94%, and 89%, respectively. The breast-based specificity was 95%. Of the 163 patients, 94 lesions in 82 patients were included in the evaluation according to pT-stage. Five lesions outside the FOV were excluded from the analysis. The sensitivities of dbPET and WB-PET/CT were 50% and 50% in pT1a, 79% and 57% in pT1b, 97% and 97% in pT1c, 100% and 95% in pT2, 100% and 100% in pT3, and 75% and 83% in pTis, respectively.

Conclusions The diagnostic performances were almost comparable between the two scanners; however, the detection rate for T1b lesions was slightly higher in dbPET, although the difference was not significant.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer with a dedicated breast PET scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer with a dedicated breast PET scanner
Kayo Nishimatsu, Yuji Nakamoto, Kanae Miyake, Shotaro Kanao, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1302;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer with a dedicated breast PET scanner
Kayo Nishimatsu, Yuji Nakamoto, Kanae Miyake, Shotaro Kanao, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1302;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Preliminary analysis of dynamic [68Ga]PSMAHBED-CC PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer
  • Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.
  • Is childhood obesity linked to lymphoma?
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Breast Cancer Posters

  • SPECT/CT assessment of sentinel lymph node reproducibility in breast cancer
  • 18F-FDG PET parameters of the primary tumor have the prognostic value in patients with operable breast cancer without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Clinical Usefulness of F18-FDG PET/CT in Young Patients with Breast Cancer
Show more MTA I: Breast Cancer Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire