Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.

Carolyn Herman, Vasantha Aaron, Mark Tann and James Fletcher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1392;
Carolyn Herman
1Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vasantha Aaron
1Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Tann
1Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Fletcher
1Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1392

Objectives To determine if assessment of pulmonary nodules based on activity compared to mediastinal blood pool differs significantly with time of flight compared to standard iterative reconstructions.

Methods Over a 2 year period, 90 18FDG-PET/CT scans were performed using both time of flight (TOF) and standard (ST) iterative acquisition and reconstruction techniques for evaluation of pulmonary nodules in a high risk population with high risk of malignancy for nodules of 80%. From these exams, 57 nodules were assessed that also had pathologic or 2 year CT follow up data available. These nodules were divided based on size criteria.

Results Nine of 13 nodules measuring 0-7mm were malignant and activity above the blood pool was present in 44% on TOF and 11% using ST. Benign lesions showed activity above blood pool in 25% (TOF) and 0% (ST). Five nodules showed activity greater than mediastinal blood pool on TOF and 80% were malignant. One nodule had activity greater than blood pool on ST and it was malignant. Thirteen of 27 pulmonary nodules measuring 8-15 mm were malignant. Activity greater than blood pool was 54% TOF and 23% ST for malignant nodules and 50% TOF and 14% ST for benign nodules. Fifteen nodules showed activity greater than blood pool on TOF, 47% of which were malignant. Five nodules had activity over blood pool on ST 23% of which malignant. Five of the 17 nodules larger than 15mm were malignant. Activity greater than the blood pool was seen in 80% (TOF) and 60% (ST) for malignant nodules and 83% (TOF) and 25% (ST) for benign lesions. Fourteen nodules showed activity greater than mediastinal blood pool on TOF and 29% of these were malignant. Six nodules had activity greater than blood pool on ST and 50% were malignant.

Conclusions Despite increased activity on time of flight, there is not improvment of differentiation between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules based on nodule to blood pool activity. However, the impact of hight incidence of malignancy in this population may have negatively affected the outcome.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.
Carolyn Herman, Vasantha Aaron, Mark Tann, James Fletcher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1392;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Time of Flight compared to standard iterative acquisition and reconstruction for assessment of pulmonary nodules.
Carolyn Herman, Vasantha Aaron, Mark Tann, James Fletcher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1392;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, contrast enhanced CT and MRI in cystic pancreatic tumors
  • 18F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer: is a dual-phase study really needed?
  • Usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of acute transformation of Adult T-cell Lymphoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Lung Cancer Posters

  • Temporal heterogeneity of intratumoral 18F-FDG accumulation in untreated lung cancers in patients
  • Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET tumor texture analysis in non-small cell lung cancer
  • Enhanced diagnostic performance of delayed/multiple time point quantitative FDG-PET/CT: A lesion-based analysis of suspected lung malignancy
Show more MTA I: Lung Cancer Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire