Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Test–Retest Reproducibility of Binding Parameters in Humans with 11C-LY2795050, an Antagonist PET Radiotracer for the κ Opioid Receptor

Mika Naganawa, Ming-Qiang Zheng, Shannan Henry, Nabeel Nabulsi, Shu-Fei Lin, Jim Ropchan, David Labaree, Soheila Najafzadeh, Michael Kapinos, Johannes Tauscher, Alexander Neumeister, Richard E. Carson and Yiyun Huang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2015, 56 (2) 243-248; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.147975
Mika Naganawa
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming-Qiang Zheng
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannan Henry
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nabeel Nabulsi
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shu-Fei Lin
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jim Ropchan
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Labaree
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soheila Najafzadeh
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Kapinos
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Tauscher
2Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Neumeister
3Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard E. Carson
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiyun Huang
1PET Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Mean ± SD of total plasma activity (A), parent fraction in plasma (B), and metabolite-corrected plasma activity (C) over time after injection of 11C-LY2795050 in test (closed circles, n = 16) and retest (open circles, n = 16) scans. A and C are displayed in SUV units (concentration/[injected dose/body weight]).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    MR images and coregistered PET images summed from 30 to 90 min after injection of 11C-LY2795050: MR images (A), test scan (B), and retest scan (C). PET images are displayed in SUV units. SUV images were averaged across all subjects.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Time–activity curves from 1 subject for 6 selected regions after injection of 11C-LY2795050 under test (A) and retest (B) conditions. Fits with MA1 (t* = 30 min) and 2TC models are displayed as solid and dotted lines, respectively.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Subject Information and PET Scan Parameters

    ParameterTest (n = 16)Retest (n = 16)
    Age (y)28 ± 728 ± 7
    Body weight (kg)78.6 ± 11.478.6 ± 11.4
    Injected dose (MBq)390 ± 135461 ± 178
    Specific activity (MBq/nmol)18.0 ± 6.421.8 ± 9.6
    Injected mass (μg)9.1 ± 1.29.1 ± 1.3
    • Data are mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Binding Parameters Derived from MA1 Method

    VT (mL/cm3)VT/fP (mL/cm3)BPNDBPP (mL/cm3)BPF (mL/cm3)
    RegionTestRetestTestRetestTestRetestTestRetestTestRetest
    Amygdala4.17 (13)3.98 (13)439 (18)448 (26)1.55 (19)1.45 (21)2.52 (15)2.33 (17)265 (21)264 (30)
    Insula3.40 (11)3.38 (10)357 (15)379 (22)1.07 (17)1.08 (14)1.74 (11)1.74 (8)183 (15)195 (20)
    Ant. cingulate cortex3.28 (12)3.26 (11)345 (16)365 (23)1.00 (14)1.00 (15)1.63 (12)1.61 (11)171 (17)181 (22)
    Globus pallidus3.13 (11)3.11 (13)329 (16)349 (26)0.92 (23)0.91 (21)1.47 (16)1.46 (20)156 (21)164 (30)
    Putamen2.90 (11)2.91 (10)305 (16)326 (22)0.77 (20)0.79 (21)1.25 (14)1.27 (15)132 (19)142 (24)
    Temporal cortex2.65 (11)2.64 (10)278 (15)295 (21)0.62 (24)0.62 (22)0.99 (17)0.99 (14)104 (20)111 (20)
    Frontal cortex2.64 (11)2.63 (11)278 (16)294 (22)0.61 (22)0.61 (20)0.98 (16)0.98 (14)104 (21)110 (22)
    Occipital cortex2.47 (11)2.45 (10)259 (15)274 (21)0.51 (30)0.51 (27)0.81 (22)0.81 (19)85 (24)90 (23)
    Hippocampus2.35 (11)2.30 (11)247 (15)259 (25)0.44 (30)0.42 (34)0.70 (25)0.66 (30)73 (26)75 (38)
    Caudate2.28 (11)2.28 (12)240 (16)256 (26)0.40 (45)0.40 (47)0.62 (40)0.63 (42)66 (43)72 (51)
    Post. cingulate cortex2.19 (12)2.17 (13)230 (17)244 (24)0.33 (43)0.34 (47)0.53 (36)0.53 (43)56 (38)59 (46)
    Thalamus2.19 (9)2.17 (9)230 (15)244 (23)0.34 (43)0.34 (47)0.53 (37)0.53 (43)57 (39)60 (45)
    Centrum semiovale2.19 (11)2.14 (16)230 (15)241 (27)0.34 (46)0.31 (48)0.54 (38)0.50 (43)56 (40)56 (47)
    Cerebellum1.94 (16)1.92 (16)203 (19)216 (26)0.17 (0)0.17 (0)0.28 (16)0.28 (16)30 (19)31 (26)
    • Ant. = anterior; Post. = posterior.

    • Data are mean of 16 subjects, with each value measured twice in test and retest scans. Data in parentheses are percentage coefficient of variation (intersubject variability).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Test–Retest Reproducibility of Volume of Distribution

    2TC, VT (mL/cm3)MA1, VT (mL/cm3)MA1, VT/fP (mL/cm3)
    RegionaTRVTRVICCaTRVTRVICCaTRVTRVICC
    Amygdala9%3% ± 11%0.39 (-0.18;0.77)12%5% ± 14%0.41 (-0.08;0.74)18%−1% ± 22%0.55 (0.11;0.82)
    Insula7%−1% ± 9%0.58 (0.13;0.84)7%0% ± 9%0.68 (0.31;0.87)14%−5% ± 18%0.46 (-0.02;0.77)
    Ant. cingulate cortex8%0% ± 10%0.61 (0.19;0.84)6%0% ± 8%0.78 (0.50;0.92)14%−5% ± 16%0.60 (0.17;0.84)
    Globus pallidus8%0% ± 10%0.70 (0.32;0.89)8%1% ± 9%0.74 (0.41;0.90)15%−4% ± 18%0.55 (0.11;0.82)
    Putamen7%−2% ± 8%0.73 (0.37;0.90)6%0% ± 7%0.81 (0.55;0.93)13%−6% ± 16%0.57 (0.14;0.83)
    Temporal cortex9%0% ± 11%0.50 (0.04;0.79)7%0% ± 8%0.70 (0.33;0.88)13%−5% ± 17%0.50 (0.04;0.79)
    Frontal cortex8%0% ± 10%0.61 (0.20;0.84)7%0% ± 8%0.74 (0.41;0.90)13%−5% ± 17%0.54 (0.09;0.81)
    Occipital cortex9%0% ± 11%0.52 (0.06;0.80)6%1% ± 7%0.77 (0.46;0.91)13%−5% ± 16%0.52 (0.07;0.80)
    Hippocampus9%2% ± 10%0.63 (0.22;0.85)8%2% ± 9%0.67 (0.28;0.87)15%−4% ± 18%0.54 (0.10;0.81)
    Caudate7%−2% ± 8%0.77 (0.42;0.92)6%0% ± 7%0.82 (0.56;0.93)13%−5% ± 16%0.60 (0.18;0.84)
    Post. cingulate cortex9%1% ± 11%0.72 (0.37;0.89)7%1% ± 9%0.76 (0.45;0.91)14%−5% ± 17%0.61 (0.19;0.84)
    Thalamus8%0% ± 9%0.50 (0.04;0.79)7%1% ± 9%0.54 (0.09;0.81)15%−5% ± 18%0.51 (0.05;0.79)
    Centrum semiovale10%4% ± 13%0.57 (0.12;0.83)10%3% ± 13%0.57 (0.14;0.83)18%−3% ± 20%0.52 (0.06;0.80)
    Cerebellum7%0% ± 9%0.85 (0.63;0.94)6%1% ± 8%0.89 (0.71;0.96)13%−5% ± 17%0.64 (0.23;0.85)
    • Ant. = anterior; Post. = posterior.

    • 2TC VT estimates with relative SE > 10% or k4 < 0.001 min−1 were excluded from calculation. Data within parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Test–Retest Reproducibility of Binding Potential

    BPNDBPP (mL/cm3)BPF (mL/cm3)
    RegionaTRVTRVICCaTRVTRVICCaTRVTRVICC
    Amygdala13%7% ± 17%0.56 (0.12;0.82)16%8% ± 20%0.24 (−0.26;0.65)22%2% ± 27%0.53 (0.07;0.80)
    Insula7%−1% ± 8%0.88 (0.71;0.96)10%0% ± 11%0.36 (−0.14;0.71)15%−6% ± 19%0.33 (−0.17;0.70)
    Ant. cingulate cortex5%0% ± 7%0.91 (0.76;0.97)8%1% ± 9%0.67 (0.29;0.87)14%−5% ± 16%0.61 (0.20;0.84)
    Globus pallidus9%1% ± 11%0.89 (0.71;0.96)10%1% ± 13%0.76 (0.45;0.91)18%−4% ± 20%0.62 (0.20;0.85)
    Putamen7%−2% ± 8%0.93 (0.82;0.98)7%−2% ± 8%0.85 (0.62;0.94)14%−7% ± 15%0.66 (0.27;0.87)
    Temporal cortex6%−1% ± 8%0.95 (0.87;0.98)9%−1% ± 10%0.77 (0.47;0.91)15%−6% ± 18%0.59 (0.16;0.83)
    Frontal cortex5%−1% ± 7%0.94 (0.83;0.98)8%0% ± 10%0.76 (0.45;0.91)15%−6% ± 18%0.63 (0.22;0.85)
    Occipital cortex9%−1% ± 13%0.95 (0.87;0.98)10%0% ± 12%0.86 (0.66;0.95)14%−6% ± 18%0.71 (0.36;0.89)
    Hippocampus15%7% ± 17%0.89 (0.72;0.96)17%7% ± 18%0.79 (0.51;0.92)22%2% ± 25%0.70 (0.33;0.88)
    Caudate10%−2% ± 16%0.98 (0.95;0.99)10%−1% ± 14%0.96 (0.90;0.99)15%−7% ± 17%0.88 (0.69;0.95)
    Post. cingulate cortex22%9% ± 44%0.92 (0.80;0.97)24%10% ± 44%0.86 (0.66;0.95)27%5% ± 45%0.82 (0.57;0.93)
    Thalamus31%22% ± 81%0.96 (0.90;0.99)36%24% ± 86%0.91 (0.77;0.97)45%22% ± 98%0.83 (0.59;0.94)
    Centrum semiovale33%16% ± 59%0.82 (0.58;0.93)35%15% ± 60%0.70 (0.34;0.88)42%11% ± 64%0.67 (0.29;0.87)
    • Ant. = anterior; Post. = posterior.

    • Data within parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 2
February 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Test–Retest Reproducibility of Binding Parameters in Humans with 11C-LY2795050, an Antagonist PET Radiotracer for the κ Opioid Receptor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Test–Retest Reproducibility of Binding Parameters in Humans with 11C-LY2795050, an Antagonist PET Radiotracer for the κ Opioid Receptor
Mika Naganawa, Ming-Qiang Zheng, Shannan Henry, Nabeel Nabulsi, Shu-Fei Lin, Jim Ropchan, David Labaree, Soheila Najafzadeh, Michael Kapinos, Johannes Tauscher, Alexander Neumeister, Richard E. Carson, Yiyun Huang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2015, 56 (2) 243-248; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147975

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Test–Retest Reproducibility of Binding Parameters in Humans with 11C-LY2795050, an Antagonist PET Radiotracer for the κ Opioid Receptor
Mika Naganawa, Ming-Qiang Zheng, Shannan Henry, Nabeel Nabulsi, Shu-Fei Lin, Jim Ropchan, David Labaree, Soheila Najafzadeh, Michael Kapinos, Johannes Tauscher, Alexander Neumeister, Richard E. Carson, Yiyun Huang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2015, 56 (2) 243-248; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147975
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • First-in-Human Assessment of 11C-LSN3172176, an M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor PET Radiotracer
  • Kinetic Modeling and Test-Retest Reproducibility of 11C-EKAP and 11C-FEKAP, Novel Agonist Radiotracers for PET Imaging of the {kappa}-Opioid Receptor in Humans
  • Impact of Pharmacological Manipulation of the {kappa}-Opioid Receptor System on Self-grooming and Anhedonic-like Behaviors in Male Mice
  • Novel 18F-Labeled {kappa}-Opioid Receptor Antagonist as PET Radiotracer: Synthesis and In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-LY2459989 in Nonhuman Primates
  • Receptor Occupancy of the {kappa}-Opioid Antagonist LY2456302 Measured with Positron Emission Tomography and the Novel Radiotracer 11C-LY2795050
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Kappa opioid receptor
  • Positron Emission Tomography
  • test–retest reproducibility
  • brain imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire