Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Prognostic value of baseline evaluation of FDG and NaF PET/CT in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Early results from a prospective phase 1 trial

Katherine Zukotynski, Chun Kim, Victor Gerbaudo, Jon Hainer, Annick Van Den Abbeele, Steven Seltzer and Christopher Sweeney
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 402;
Katherine Zukotynski
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chun Kim
2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Gerbaudo
2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Hainer
2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annick Van Den Abbeele
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Seltzer
2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Sweeney
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

402

Objectives To evaluate baseline (BL) FDG and NaF PET/CT for predicting response to cabozantinib and abiraterone therapy (Tx) in CRPC.

Methods 9 men with CRPC had FDG and NaF PET/CT at BL and after 8wk on Tx. Standard imaging (bone scan and CT) was done at BL and every 8wk on Tx. FDG-avid disease extent was classified as widespread (FDG++), oligometastatic ie. ≤2 sites (FDG+) and non-FDG-avid (FDG-); SUVmax of the most intense site (MAX) and average SUVmax of up to the 5 most intense sites (AV) were assessed; Tx response using PCWG guidelines and days on trial (DOT) were recorded.

Results Of 9 men, 2 were classified as FDG++; both subsequently had progressive disease (PD) despite Tx (DOT 84 and 77d) and are now deceased or in hospice. 2 men were classified as FDG+; 1 had PD (DOT=231d), and 1 is without PD (still on trial after 540d). MAX and AV in the 2 FDG++ men were higher than in the 2 FDG+ men. Of 5 FDG- men, 4 had stable or improved disease on Tx (still on trial or stopped for non-oncologic reason; DOT = 225-407d), and only 1 had PD but with a longer DOT (282d) than in 3 men with FDG-avid disease. Despite small data size, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly significant difference (p=0.012) among the 3 groups of men (FDG++, FDG+, FDG-) (Fig. 1). All 4 men with FDG-avid BL disease had FDG-avid disease at 8wk. All 9 men had NaF-avid disease (widespread in 8) at BL and at 8wk. Neither disease extent nor intensity (MAX or AV) on NaF PET was predictive of Tx response or prognosis. Standard imaging did not appear to have prognostic information.

Conclusions Based on our small sample size, BL FDG PET/CT may predict response to cabozantinib and abiraterone Tx for CRPC and may be superior to NaF PET/CT and standard imaging. Also, FDG has potential to stratify men with CRPC into 3 groups (widespread, oligometastaic and non-FDG-avid disease) to tailor Tx. Further evaluation is warranted.

Research Support RSNA, PCF and BWH

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic value of baseline evaluation of FDG and NaF PET/CT in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Early results from a prospective phase 1 trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prognostic value of baseline evaluation of FDG and NaF PET/CT in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Early results from a prospective phase 1 trial
Katherine Zukotynski, Chun Kim, Victor Gerbaudo, Jon Hainer, Annick Van Den Abbeele, Steven Seltzer, Christopher Sweeney
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 402;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic value of baseline evaluation of FDG and NaF PET/CT in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Early results from a prospective phase 1 trial
Katherine Zukotynski, Chun Kim, Victor Gerbaudo, Jon Hainer, Annick Van Den Abbeele, Steven Seltzer, Christopher Sweeney
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 402;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Detection of recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma: comparison of fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET) with contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (ceCT) and CA19.9
  • Prediction of hormonal resistance in metastatic prostate cancer with FDG PET/CT
  • Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Prostate/GU Cancers: Choline, FDG, NaF

  • Role of choline PET/CT in guiding lymph nodal radiation treatment and in predicting outcome in recurrent prostate cancer patients
  • Comparative effectiveness of [18F]-Fluorocholine PET-CT and pelvic MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in the primary and lymph node staging of high risk prostate cancer: Data from 47 prospectively enrolled patients
Show more Prostate/GU Cancers: Choline, FDG, NaF

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire