Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma

ByeongHyeon Byeon, Chang-Bae Kong and Sang Moo Lim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1461;
ByeongHyeon Byeon
1Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chang-Bae Kong
1Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Moo Lim
1Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1461

Objectives We compared the usefulness of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting histologic response in patients with osteosarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods We retrospectively enrolled 62 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma treated with two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. All patients underwent 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after NAC. 99mTc-MDP uptake of primary tumor was measured quantitatively as the maximum tumor-to-nontumor ratio (T/NT) and 18F-FDG uptake was measured as the maximum SUV (SUV) before and after NAC. The percent changes of T/NT (%T/NT) and SUV (%SUV) after NAC were calculated respectively, and the correlations between these parameters were evaluated. After surgery, the effects of NAC were graded histopathologically (good vs. poor) and the optimum cut-off values of %T/NT and %SUV for predicting histologic response were assessed by ROC curve analysis respectively.

Results %T/NT and %SUV positively correlated with each other (r = 0.549, p < 0.001). Based on ROC curve analysis, both %T/NT (AUC = 0.768, p < 0.001) and %SUV (AUC = 0.829, p < 0.001) predicted good histologic response. However, there was no significant difference between the AUCs of %T/NT and %SUV (p = 0.373). The sensitivity and specificity for predicting good histologic response were 83.3% and 75.0%, for the criterion of %T/NT < -10% and 80.0% and 81.2%, for the criterion of %SUV < -45%.

Conclusions Both 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT are useful for predicting histologic response after NAC in osteosarcoma.

Research Support This work was supported by Establishment of Center for PET Application Technology Development, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), and by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (50441-2015).

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma
ByeongHyeon Byeon, Chang-Bae Kong, Sang Moo Lim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1461;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma
ByeongHyeon Byeon, Chang-Bae Kong, Sang Moo Lim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1461;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • PET/CT as a predictor of malignancy in indeterminate lung nodules
  • Mismatch between intratumoral blood perfusion and glucose metabolism in same patients with cancer by 18FDG PET/CT scans: A Pilot human study
  • Diagnosis value of trimoality PET/CT-MR in digestive tract disease
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Sarcoma/Melanoma Posters

  • Outcome and response prediction for primary and oligometastatic spinal sarcoma patients who received stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
  • Value of F-18-FDG PET/CT in the staging, restaging, monitoring of response to therapy and surveillance of uterine leiomyosarcomas.
  • Comparison of Diagnostic Performances of FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging Modalities in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
Show more MTA I: Sarcoma/Melanoma Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire