Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Updated NIST standards for dose calibrator measurements of imaging and therapeutic nuclides

Denis Bergeron, Jeffrey Cessna and Brian Zimmerman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2151;
Denis Bergeron
1NIST, Gaithersburg, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Cessna
1NIST, Gaithersburg, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Zimmerman
1NIST, Gaithersburg, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2151

Objectives To preserve activity standards for short-lived radionuclides, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) establishes calibration factors for reentrant ionization chambers (ICs). In nuclear medicine clinics, similar ICs are referred to as “dose calibrators”, and nuclide-specific calibration factors are referred to as “dial settings”. Over the past few years, NIST has determined dial settings for new instruments and geometries for nuclides such as Lu-177 and In-111 and updated settings as primary standards for some nuclides have been revisited.

Methods Dial setting determinations were performed on the NIST-maintained set of dose calibrators; this set comprises eight instruments from three manufacturers. In all cases, calibration factors were determined for the NIST standard 5 mL ampoule. For Lu-177 and Ra-223, we also considered clinical geometries. Standard activities were determined by reference to earlier NIST standards or in some cases by direct assay by primary methods.

Results Activities determined with the new calibration factors for F-18, based on the new NIST primary standard (which is in good accord with standards from other National Metrology Institutes), differ from the earlier NIST standard by +4.0 %. New calibration factors for In-111 give activities approximately 3 % higher than the manufacturer-recommended settings. For I-123, we found an 11.3 % spread in activities (from -3.3 % to +8.0 %, relative to the NIST standard activity) using different manufacturers’ recommended settings.

Conclusions NIST-determined dose calibrator dial settings provide an important point of comparison for clinical measurements. Some of the measurement biases identified here exceed 10 %, making intercomparability of quantitative imaging data impossible and dose calculation inaccurate. NIST strives to disseminate accurate standards to increase confidence in clinical measurements, reduce measurement uncertainties, and facilitate truly comparable values in quantitative molecular imaging.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Updated NIST standards for dose calibrator measurements of imaging and therapeutic nuclides
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Updated NIST standards for dose calibrator measurements of imaging and therapeutic nuclides
Denis Bergeron, Jeffrey Cessna, Brian Zimmerman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2151;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Updated NIST standards for dose calibrator measurements of imaging and therapeutic nuclides
Denis Bergeron, Jeffrey Cessna, Brian Zimmerman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2151;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
  • Assessment of Tumor Burden in Lymphoma Patients with Deauville Score 4 Disease on Post Therapy FDG PET
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

  • A novel 4D-phantom using rapid prototyping of anatomically realistic tumor models for evaluation of PET/CT and PET-guided radiotherapy
  • Impact of body mass index on CT dose-index reproducibility with automatic tube current modulation
  • A pre-clinical PET scanner based on a single piece of annular scintillator: a simulation study
Show more MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire