Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Kinetic modeling using a two-tissue compartment model and an additional irreversible vascular component improves the quantification of [11C]PBR28 brain PET data

Gaia Rizzo, Mattia Veronese, Matteo Tonietto, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara, Federico Turkheimer and Alessandra Bertoldo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2020;
Gaia Rizzo
1DEI, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mattia Veronese
2King, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Tonietto
1DEI, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara
3INCIA, Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Turkheimer
2King, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Bertoldo
1DEI, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2020

Objectives We propose a novel kinetic model for the neuroinflammation ligand [11C]-PBR28. This model hypothesizes the existence of an additional irreversible component from the blood to the endothelium, similar to that previously demonstrated for [11C]-(R)-PK11195

Methods The model (2TCM-1K) was tested on a dataset of ten healthy subjects. A simulation was also performed to quantify the error generated by the standard 2TCM when the presence of the irreversible component is not taken into account

Results Compared to standard 2TCM, 2TCM-1K improved the curves fit to the tissue data points in all the regions and increased the randomness of the weighted residuals. 2TCM-1K poorly identified only one brain region in one subject. In contrast, 2TCM showed a poor fit in 4% of the brain regions. Akaike score was lower for 2TCM-1K in 94% of the regions. Importantly, the VT values obtained with 2TCM and 2TCM-1K were also poorly correlated (R2 < 0.4). VT 2TCM-1K estimates were found to be better correlated region-wise with mRNA TSPO gene expression than 2TCM (r = 0.54 and r = -0.42 respectively). Simulated data showed that 2TCM is not very sensitive to variations in tissular VT, as differences greater than 50% translated into estimated VT variations of 15% or less

Conclusions A kinetic model that accounts for the endothelial irreversible binding of TSPO tracers improves the quantification of [11C]PBR28 brain PET data

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kinetic modeling using a two-tissue compartment model and an additional irreversible vascular component improves the quantification of [11C]PBR28 brain PET data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Kinetic modeling using a two-tissue compartment model and an additional irreversible vascular component improves the quantification of [11C]PBR28 brain PET data
Gaia Rizzo, Mattia Veronese, Matteo Tonietto, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara, Federico Turkheimer, Alessandra Bertoldo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2020;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Kinetic modeling using a two-tissue compartment model and an additional irreversible vascular component improves the quantification of [11C]PBR28 brain PET data
Gaia Rizzo, Mattia Veronese, Matteo Tonietto, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara, Federico Turkheimer, Alessandra Bertoldo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2020;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
  • Assessment of Tumor Burden in Lymphoma Patients with Deauville Score 4 Disease on Post Therapy FDG PET
  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Detection of dementia-related hypometabolism using two different age-adjusted reference FDG- PET databases
  • Localized Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Lateralization and Surgical Intervention
  • An adaptive motion correction method for PET/CT Brain Imaging
Show more MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire