Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportNeurosciences

Comparison of SUVr calculations in amyloid PET brain imaging

Karin Knesaurek, Geoffrey Warnock, Panagiotis Sideras and Cyrill Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1873;
Karin Knesaurek
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey Warnock
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Panagiotis Sideras
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cyrill Burger
3PMOD Technologies Ltd, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1873

Objectives The aim of our study was to compare two methods for SUVr calculations in amyloid PET brain imaging.

Methods In a continuing study, 19 patients were imaged on a GE STE 16 slice PET/CT system with 370 kBq of 18F florbetapir. The data were reconstructed using the vendor’s reconstruction software. Corresponding MRI data were retrieved from the PACS system and matched PET and MRI data was transferred to a common platform. Two methods for calculation of the ratio of cortical to cerebellar signal (SUVr) were used. One was based on the MIM Software Inc., Version 6.1 software and only uses PET data. The second approach used the PMOD NEURO tool (version 3.501). This approach utilizes PET and corresponding MRI data (preferably T1 weighted) for better brain segmentation.

Results For amyloid negative subjects, average SUVr ± SD values were 0.95±0.01 and 1.00±0.12, for MIM and PMOD applications, respectively. For amyloid positive patients, average SUVr values were 1.30±0.19 and 1.28±0.25. SUVr values from the two methods were compared by Bland-Altman analysis. The 95% limits of agreement were calculated by mean ± 1.96 standard deviation and were 0.04 ± 0.29. Linear fitting yielded a slope and intercept of 0.87 and 0.16, respectively, and the correlation coefficient was 0.81.

Conclusions Our results indicated that the SUVr values derived using MIM and PMOD are effectively interchangeable and well correlated.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of SUVr calculations in amyloid PET brain imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of SUVr calculations in amyloid PET brain imaging
Karin Knesaurek, Geoffrey Warnock, Panagiotis Sideras, Cyrill Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1873;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of SUVr calculations in amyloid PET brain imaging
Karin Knesaurek, Geoffrey Warnock, Panagiotis Sideras, Cyrill Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 1873;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurosciences

  • PET CT Quantification to direct Alzheimer’s patients to anti-amyloid therapy
  • Multicenter trial study for usefulness of physical parameters toward the standardization of brain SPECT image: relation to visual analysis
  • Assessment of Brain Perfusion 123I-IMP SPECT imaging Using Low Energy High Resolution Collimator image reconstructed by Flash 3D
Show more Neurosciences

MTA II: Neurology Posters

  • Correlation of metabolic and volumetric metrics of the structures of the temporal lobe on MRI and FDG-PET in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis
  • SPECT Brain imaging in HIV infected individuals with new onset seizures
  • 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET is a strong predictor of the prognosis in the patients with recurrent high-grade glioma receiving Bevacizumab treatment
Show more MTA II: Neurology Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire