Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Early Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy: Which Prostate Cancer Patients May Benefit from a Restaging 11C-Choline PET/CT Scan Before Salvage Radiation Therapy?

Paolo Castellucci, Francesco Ceci, Tiziano Graziani, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Renzo Mazzarotto, Cinzia Pettinato, Monica Celli, Filippo Lodi and Stefano Fanti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2014, 55 (9) 1424-1429; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.138313
Paolo Castellucci
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Ceci
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiziano Graziani
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riccardo Schiavina
2Department of Urology, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugenio Brunocilla
2Department of Urology, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renzo Mazzarotto
3Service of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cinzia Pettinato
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Celli
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filippo Lodi
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefano Fanti
1Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    A 68-y-old patient treated with RP for PCa (T3aN0M0; GS = 4 + 4). PSA = 0.85 ng/mL, PSAdt = 7.4 mo, PSAvel = 0.94 ng/mL/y. 11C-choline PET/CT showed a positive finding in prostate bed, later confirmed at histologic analysis. (A) CT image. (B) PET image. (C) Fusion image.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A 76-y-old patient treated with RP for PCa (T2bN0M0; GS = 4 + 3). PSA = 1.95 ng/mL, PSAdt = 4.8 mo, PSAvel = 1.6 ng/mL/y. Patient was scheduled for S-RT. 11C-choline PET/CT performed before S-RT (Fig. 1A) showed pathologic choline uptake in common subcentimetric right iliac LN (CT [A], PET [B], and fusion [C] images) and small solitary bone lesion on left ischium (CT [D], PET [E], and fusion [F] images).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    11C-choline PET/CT detection rate in different patient subpopulations.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Population Characteristics

    CharacteristicMeanMedian ± SDRangeFrequency%
    Age (y)68.970 ± 6.747–84
    PSA (ng/mL)11.1 ± 0.60.2–2
    PSAdt (mo)8.56 ± 8.60.3–48
    PSAVel (ng/mL/y)8.23.7 ± 1.70.1–15.6
    GSMedian, 74–9
    TNMT2cN0M0T2aN0M0, T4N0M0
    Primary therapies
     RP48780.5
     RP + adjuvant RT11819.5
     Ongoing ADT14824.5
    Time to relapse (mo)
     <1219.2116
     >1280.8489
    • n = 605 patients.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    PSA Values and PSA Kinetics in PET-Positive and PET-Negative Patients

    PatientFrequency%MeanMedian ± SDRange
    PET-positive17228.4
     PSA1.31.2 ± 0.50.2–2
     PSAdt4.63.8 ± 0.30.7–21
     PSAvel2.21.6 ± 2.10.1–15.6
    PET-negative43371.6
     PSA1.01.1 ± 0.50.2–2
     PSAdt10.37.3 ± 9.70.4–48.0
     PSAvel1.10.6 ± 1.40.1–9.9
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Univariate and Multivariate Binary Logistic Regression Analysis

    Univariate binary logistic regressionMultivariate binary logistic regression
    95% CI95% CI
    VariableORLowerUpperPORLowerUpperP
    ADT2.8851.9534.2620.0011.5121.0264.7860.001
    Age0.9360.6181.4180.7542.8470.7797.8960.441
    GS2.2241.2334.0140.0081.0890.2983.9870.897
    PSA1.9061.3992.5970.0011.9131.7594.8190.016
    PSAdt0.8170.7660.8710.0010.6950.5520.8730.020
    PSAvel1.5021.2971.7400.0011.0280.8671.2190.753
    TNM1.0370.5192.0690.9190.6540.2631.6260.361
    TTR1.3560.8792.0920.1691.5950.5414.7040.397
    • TTR = time to relapse.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Patient Subpopulations Grouped According to Risk Factors Significantly Related to 11C-Choline PET/CT Positivity and to Prediction of Distant Recurrence Outside Prostate Bed

    PopulationNo. of patients (n)Overall detection rate (%)Distant relapse (%)Locoregional LNs (%)
    Overall60528.414.88.3
    PSA ≥ 1.05 ng/mL18548.628.69.8
    PSAdt < 5.95 mo*
    PSA < 1.05 ng/mL1397.93.62.1
    PSAdt ≥ 5.95 mo*
    PSA < 1.05 ng/mL1294.62.31.5
    PSAdt ≥ 5.95 mo
    Ongoing ADT, no
    PSA ≥ 1.05 ng/mL6861.836.817.6
    PSAdt < 5.95 mo
    Ongoing ADT, yes
    PSA < 1.05 ng/mL7644.721.117.1
    PSAdt < 5.95 mo*
    PSAdt ≥ 5.95 mo*30716.47.23.4
    PSAdt < 5.95 mo*29847.325.912.4
    PSA < 1.05 ng/mL*29123108.5
    PSA ≥ 1.05 ng/mL*30433.419.48
    Ongoing ADT
     No45722.710.96.6
     Yes1484626.314.2
    • ↵* All patients in and out of ADT.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 9
September 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Early Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy: Which Prostate Cancer Patients May Benefit from a Restaging 11C-Choline PET/CT Scan Before Salvage Radiation Therapy?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Early Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy: Which Prostate Cancer Patients May Benefit from a Restaging 11C-Choline PET/CT Scan Before Salvage Radiation Therapy?
Paolo Castellucci, Francesco Ceci, Tiziano Graziani, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Renzo Mazzarotto, Cinzia Pettinato, Monica Celli, Filippo Lodi, Stefano Fanti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2014, 55 (9) 1424-1429; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138313

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Early Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy: Which Prostate Cancer Patients May Benefit from a Restaging 11C-Choline PET/CT Scan Before Salvage Radiation Therapy?
Paolo Castellucci, Francesco Ceci, Tiziano Graziani, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Renzo Mazzarotto, Cinzia Pettinato, Monica Celli, Filippo Lodi, Stefano Fanti
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2014, 55 (9) 1424-1429; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138313
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Is Radiocholine PET/CT Already Clinically Useful in Patients with Prostate Cancer?
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multiphasic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Early Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1 ng/mL: A Prospective Study of 135 Patients
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • The Utility of PET/CT in the Planning of External Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on Management in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT for Treatment Planning, Response Assessment, and Prognosis
  • What Medical, Urologic, and Radiation Oncologists Want from Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • Is Radiocholine PET/CT Already Clinically Useful in Patients with Prostate Cancer?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 11C-choline PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • biochemical relapse
  • PSA kinetics
  • risk factors
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire