Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Glypican-3–Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Jonathan G. Sham, Forrest M. Kievit, John R. Grierson, Robert S. Miyaoka, Matthew M. Yeh, Miqin Zhang, Raymond S. Yeung, Satoshi Minoshima and James O. Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (5) 799-804; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.132118
Jonathan G. Sham
1Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Forrest M. Kievit
2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Grierson
3Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Miyaoka
3Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew M. Yeh
4Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miqin Zhang
5Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond S. Yeung
1Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoshi Minoshima
3Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James O. Park
1Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data demonstrating GPC3 expression relative to GAPDH across multiple cell lines verified by 2 nonoverlapping primer pairs.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    In vitro binding of 89Zr-αGPC3 after 1 h of treatment. All results are in HepG2 cells except final column (HLF).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Tissue biodistribution measured by Cobra II γ counter in non–tumor-bearing 8-wk-old female Nu/J mice (n = 4 each). Blocking was performed with 1.0–1.2 mg of unlabeled αGPC3.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A) IVIS luminescent images before administration of 89Zr-αGPC3. (B) Selected small-animal PET images of same animals showing tumor concordance in HepG2 tumor-bearing animals and lack of tumor uptake in RH7777, blocked, and heat-denatured controls. Signal saturation was permitted to enable comparisons between animals. Blue arrowheads indicate tumor location; red arrow indicates spleen. (C) Day 7 decay-corrected biodistribution of 89Zr-αGPC3 confirming low liver tumor uptake in RH7777, blocked, and heat-denatured controls.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    (A and B) Serial decay-corrected whole-body small-animal PET images of mouse bearing large HepG2 tumor (3.8 mm) (A) and small HepG2 tumor (<1 mm) (B). Blue arrowhead indicates tumor location. (C and D) Average tumor and liver activity obtained from small-animal PET data for mouse with large HepG2 tumor (C) and mouse with small HepG2 tumor (D).

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Histologic sections of PET-imaged mouse liver (L) and liver tumor (T) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (top row) and immunohistochemistry against GPC3 (middle row) viewed at ×100 magnification. Immunohistochemistry confirms polymerase chain reaction data showing high expression in HepG2 and minimal expression in RH7777 tumors. Bottom row demonstrates immunofluorescence of goat antimouse secondary antibody binding against mouse antihuman αGPC3 in HepG2 and RH7777 tumors.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 5
May 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glypican-3–Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Glypican-3–Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Jonathan G. Sham, Forrest M. Kievit, John R. Grierson, Robert S. Miyaoka, Matthew M. Yeh, Miqin Zhang, Raymond S. Yeung, Satoshi Minoshima, James O. Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (5) 799-804; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.132118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Glypican-3–Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Jonathan G. Sham, Forrest M. Kievit, John R. Grierson, Robert S. Miyaoka, Matthew M. Yeh, Miqin Zhang, Raymond S. Yeung, Satoshi Minoshima, James O. Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (5) 799-804; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.132118
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Glypican-3–Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Where Antibody Imaging Dares to Tread
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Glypican-3-Targeted 227Th {alpha}-Therapy Reduces Tumor Burden in an Orthotopic Xenograft Murine Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Galectin-3 Targeting in Thyroid Orthotopic Tumors Opens New Ways to Characterize Thyroid Cancer
  • Pretargeted Immuno-PET: Overcoming Limitations of Space and Time
  • Glypican-3-Targeting F(ab')2 for 89Zr PET of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Glypican-3-Targeted 89Zr PET Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Where Antibody Imaging Dares to Tread
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • 89Zr
  • glypican 3
  • liver
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire