Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on QGS, ECT and 4DM-SPECT with comparison to cardiac catheterization (CC) and cardiac echocardiogram (CE) in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)

Alireza Esfahane, Subhash Paknikar, John Terry, Thomas Dworak, Matthew DeVries, Charles Morris, Robin High, Donald Orton, Gopi Sirineni and Jordan Hankins
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1718;
Alireza Esfahane
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subhash Paknikar
2Creighton Univ Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Terry
2Creighton Univ Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Dworak
2Creighton Univ Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew DeVries
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Morris
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin High
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald Orton
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gopi Sirineni
2Creighton Univ Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordan Hankins
1Nuclear Medicine, Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1718

Objectives Comparison and evaluation of LVEF between software programs (QGS, ECT and 4DM-SPECT) in MPI with CC and CE.

Methods 699 subjects (361 M, 338 F) with or without known CAD were retrospectively studied. The patients were selected by searching the radiology database at UNMC and CUMC. Subjects were classified into 2 groups, which LVEF was calculated either by QGS and ECT (EF method is R1) at CUMC or by 4DM-SPECT and ECT at UNMC and compared with LVEF was reported on CC and CE. Finally, correlation between gender, age, BMI, DM, FH and the modalities for estimation of LVEF were studied. Differences in means of these data were evaluated with paired t-tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed.

Results Patient age range was 30-99 years old (mean 65.7 ± 12.6), BMI from 14-64 (mean 32.3 ± 8.2), EDV from 11-340 (Mean 112 ± 48.6) ESV from 2-298 (mean 49 ± 39.9). Correlation of ECT RLVEF with QGS RLVEF and 4DM- SPECT RLVEF were 0.8461 and 0.7783 respectively. Correlation of ECT SLVEF with QGS SLVEF and 4DM- SPECT SLVEF were 0.920 and 0.883 respectively. Correlation between CC and CE shows 0.561 and 0.468 at Creighton and UNMC respectively. At neither institution there is a significant difference between the means for CC and CE (P values 0.32 and 0.29 respectively). Finally the data shows CC has LVEF mean (56.4 ± 10.0) which is the closest to ECT LVEF mean (56.0± 14.9 and 55.1 ± 14.2 for rest and stress respectively) and CE has LVEF mean (52.7± 12.1), which is the closest to QGS LVEF mean (52.6± 14.3 and 53.7 ± 14.4 for rest and stress respectively). 4D-MSPECT LVEF mean (65.5± 15.0 and 64.1 ± 14.8 for rest and stress respectively) is the most far from either software to CC or CE.

Conclusions LVEF mean estimates by CC is the closest to LVEF mean calculated by ECT and LVEF mean estimated by CE is the closest to LVEF mean calculated by QGS.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on QGS, ECT and 4DM-SPECT with comparison to cardiac catheterization (CC) and cardiac echocardiogram (CE) in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on QGS, ECT and 4DM-SPECT with comparison to cardiac catheterization (CC) and cardiac echocardiogram (CE) in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)
Alireza Esfahane, Subhash Paknikar, John Terry, Thomas Dworak, Matthew DeVries, Charles Morris, Robin High, Donald Orton, Gopi Sirineni, Jordan Hankins
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1718;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on QGS, ECT and 4DM-SPECT with comparison to cardiac catheterization (CC) and cardiac echocardiogram (CE) in nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)
Alireza Esfahane, Subhash Paknikar, John Terry, Thomas Dworak, Matthew DeVries, Charles Morris, Robin High, Donald Orton, Gopi Sirineni, Jordan Hankins
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1718;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular

  • Cardiac β-Adrenergic Receptor Downregulation, Evaluated by Cardiac PET, in Chronotropic Incompetence
  • Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the 18F-Flurpiridaz Phase III Clinical Trial
  • Quantification of Macrophage-Driven Inflammation During Myocardial Infarction with 18F-LW223, a Novel TSPO Radiotracer with Binding Independent of the rs6971 Human Polymorphism
Show more Cardiovascular

MTA II: Cardiovascular (Clinical) Posters

  • Dependency of Rb-82 normal distribution on PET camera and processing
  • Prevalence of myocardial viability in left ventricular aneurysm assessed by 99mTc-MIBI SPECT and 18F-FDG PET and the related parameters
  • The use of FDG-PET/CT to evaluate vascular inflammation in inflammatory diseases compared to healthy controls: A pilot study
Show more MTA II: Cardiovascular (Clinical) Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire