Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular

Dependency of Rb-82 normal distribution on PET camera and processing

Edward Ficaro, Marcelo Di Carli, Robert deKemp, Tyler Kaster, Venkatesh Murthy and James Corbett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1736;
Edward Ficaro
1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo Di Carli
2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert deKemp
3University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler Kaster
3University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Venkatesh Murthy
1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Corbett
1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1736

Objectives With SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, different cameras and processing protocols result in variable normal myocardial tracer distributions, necessitating multiple normal databases for quantification. The objective of this study was to investigate the variation of normal myocardial Rb-82 distribution with different PET cameras and processing.

Methods Normal Rb-82 distributions were constructed from separate 40 low-likelihood (20F/20M) populations imaged on two cameras, GE DST and GE D690, at two different institutions using standard PET imaging parameters. Both PET systems provide corrections for attenuation and scatter with the D690 imaging in 3D with 3D modeling. Gender specific and composite databases were constructed for each system and regional 9-segment distributions were compared using Student’s t-test. Quantitative defect size and summed stress score (SSS) were compared between databases using the Corridor4DM software in 175 consecutive patients referred for Rb-82 PET imaging. In a subgroup of 56 patients, quantitative perfusion was correlated to coronary angiography.

Results Comparison of regional distributions showed only the apex to be mildly different (p=0.046) between the two cameras. In 175 patients, both defects size and SSS were highly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.99 for both and slopes of 1.00 and 0.99, respectively). Bland-Altman differences were 0.5+/-3.1(%) for defect extent and 0.2+/-1.8 for SSS. Angiographic correlation showed no significant differences for the detection of CAD by patient or by vessel. Similar results were found when comparing the composite and gender specific distributions on the same system or between systems.

Conclusions Rb-82 normal distributions were found to be clinically equivalent between two camera systems and between genders. This study demonstrates that a single normal distribution may be used for different cameras and centers enabling comparison and pooling of quantitative data.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dependency of Rb-82 normal distribution on PET camera and processing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dependency of Rb-82 normal distribution on PET camera and processing
Edward Ficaro, Marcelo Di Carli, Robert deKemp, Tyler Kaster, Venkatesh Murthy, James Corbett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1736;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dependency of Rb-82 normal distribution on PET camera and processing
Edward Ficaro, Marcelo Di Carli, Robert deKemp, Tyler Kaster, Venkatesh Murthy, James Corbett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1736;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular

  • Cardiac β-Adrenergic Receptor Downregulation, Evaluated by Cardiac PET, in Chronotropic Incompetence
  • Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the 18F-Flurpiridaz Phase III Clinical Trial
  • Quantification of Macrophage-Driven Inflammation During Myocardial Infarction with 18F-LW223, a Novel TSPO Radiotracer with Binding Independent of the rs6971 Human Polymorphism
Show more Cardiovascular

MTA II: Cardiovascular (Clinical) Posters

  • Reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fractions using PET blood flow and metabolism tracers: Rb-82, N-13-ammonia and F-18-FDG
  • Prognostic value of simultaneous myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary calcium score (CCS) assessment in patients with intermediate likelihood of CAD: A 5-year follow-up study
Show more MTA II: Cardiovascular (Clinical) Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire