Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Can BRAF V600E mutation alter F-18 FDG uptake?

Lindsay Luttrell, Yong Bradley, Laurentia Nodit, Karla Matteson and James Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1615;
Lindsay Luttrell
1University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong Bradley
1University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurentia Nodit
1University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karla Matteson
1University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Lewis
1University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1615

Objectives BRAF somatic mutations are found in primary and metastatic melanomas. Commonly found BRAF mutants stimulate RAF/MEK (mitogen-activated ERK-activating kinase)/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) pathway activation. BRAF V600E is the most common of the BRAF mutations. The objective of this study is to determine if BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma alters F-18 FDG PET/CT uptake in patients with melanoma.

Methods 29 patients with melanoma who had prior PET/CT and subsequent resection were reviewed. However, only 17 patients had enough residual tissue to further evaluation for the BRAF V600E to be included in the study. PET/CT studies were evaluated at the primary and metastatic sites. Pathology was assessed to see the size of the biopsied lesions to ensure that enough of the tissue was present to be localized on the PET/CT scan.

Results BRAF V600E testing was positive in 9 of 17 patients. PET/CT was positive in 5 of 9 patients (55%) and negative on 4 of 9 patients (45%). In patients who had negative BRAF V600E test, PET/CT was positive on 6 of 8 patients (75%) and negative on 2 of 8 patients (25%).

Conclusions A negative PET/CT scan in a patient with a positive BRAF V600E should be scrutinized more carefully as there is a higher probability of a false negative PET/CT scan.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can BRAF V600E mutation alter F-18 FDG uptake?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Can BRAF V600E mutation alter F-18 FDG uptake?
Lindsay Luttrell, Yong Bradley, Laurentia Nodit, Karla Matteson, James Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1615;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Can BRAF V600E mutation alter F-18 FDG uptake?
Lindsay Luttrell, Yong Bradley, Laurentia Nodit, Karla Matteson, James Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1615;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • High detection performance and accurate staging of adrenal glands using state-of-the-art PET/CT
  • Baseline total lesion glycolysis by positron emission tomography/ computed tomography as a best prognostic parameter for patients with primary thyroid lymphoma
  • Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for cutaneous lesions from extranodal natural killer/ T-cell lymphoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Sarcoma/Melanoma Posters

  • Impact of PET-CT in soft-tissue sarcomas
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent malignant melanoma
  • The Combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy for the Prediction of Prognosis of Patients with Osteosarcoma.
Show more MTA I: Sarcoma/Melanoma Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire