Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Evaluation of the effect of magnetic field on the positron range/PET spatial resolution in clinical PET scanners

Ju-Chieh (Kevin) Cheng, Richard Laforest and Agus Priatna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2417;
Ju-Chieh (Kevin) Cheng
1Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Laforest
1Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agus Priatna
2Siemens USA, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2417

Objectives With the recent advance in technology, simultaneous PET/MR scanners have become a reality. In this work, we evaluate the effect of the magnetic field on the positron range/PET spatial resolution using experimental phantoms and electron transport simulations (EGS).

Methods A 68Ga (a relatively long range positron emitter) line source surrounded by water and a 68Ga contrast phantom were scanned on the Siemens’ Biograph-mMR (mMR) and on the Biograph-40 (B40) to measure spatial resolution and sphere contrast with and without magnetic field. The phantoms were aligned along the magnetic field and positioned near the center of the field of view (FOV). The EGS simulations were performed with a 3T and 0T magnetic field. The resolution and contrast for the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field were measured for the experimental and simulated images.

Results The FWHM for the 68Ga line source was 5.44 mm for the B40 and 5.28 mm for the mMR while 5.98 mm for 0T and 5.18 mm for 3T with EGS. The FWTM was 9.88 mm for the B40 and 9.45 mm for the mMR while 10.96 mm for 0T and 9.57 mm for 3T with EGS. Experimental contrasts with and without magnetic field were nearly identical, while simulations predicted a slight improvement under a 3T magnetic field. The difference between the experimental and simulated results might be due to the differences between the two scanners (e.g. different transaxial and axial FOV).

Conclusions A 3% reduction of the FWHM in resolution was observed from the 68Ga line source phantom, while the EGS simulation suggests a 13% reduction of the FWHM under a 3T magnetic field. Small effect on contrast was observed from simulations and experiments at 3T for 68Ga. Experiments and simulations will be performed for lower density materials and other long range positron emitters such as 76Br. Resolution parallel to the magnetic field will also be evaluated. A detailed discussion on the effect of the magnetic field on the point spread function (1D and 3D) as well as its effect on resolution and contrast recovery will be presented

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the effect of magnetic field on the positron range/PET spatial resolution in clinical PET scanners
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the effect of magnetic field on the positron range/PET spatial resolution in clinical PET scanners
Ju-Chieh (Kevin) Cheng, Richard Laforest, Agus Priatna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2417;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the effect of magnetic field on the positron range/PET spatial resolution in clinical PET scanners
Ju-Chieh (Kevin) Cheng, Richard Laforest, Agus Priatna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2417;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

  • A novel 4D-phantom using rapid prototyping of anatomically realistic tumor models for evaluation of PET/CT and PET-guided radiotherapy
  • Impact of body mass index on CT dose-index reproducibility with automatic tube current modulation
  • A pre-clinical PET scanner based on a single piece of annular scintillator: a simulation study
Show more MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire