Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Gamma camera count rate performance assessment without specialized equipment

Martin Lodge and Richard Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2406;
Martin Lodge
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Wahl
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2406

Objectives Assessment of gamma camera count rate performance is ideally performed as part of acceptance testing and is also an annual requirement of certain accreditation organizations (e.g. ACR). Unfortunately the current NEMA NU 1-2007 procedure for assessing count loss is impractical as it involves a 2 day dynamic protocol that is not supported on many gamma camera systems. In this study we investigate alternative methods for measuring count loss, including a new method that requires no specialized test equipment.

Methods We propose a new variable-distance method involving two Tc-99m point sources: a low activity source (~0.6 MBq) and a high activity source (~12 MBq). The incident count rate is controlled by adjusting the distance between the source and the face of an uncollimated gamma camera. At each distance, data are separately acquired for both sources. A plot of the count rates for the high activity source against those for the low activity source indicates the count rate performance of the system, under the assumption that the low activity source causes negligible dead-time. The results of this method were compared with results obtained using the copper attenuator method (Geldenhuys 1988).

Results None of the 8 gamma cameras at our institution were capable of performing the NEMA NU 1-2007 protocol. The new variable-distance method was successfully implemented on all cameras. The slope of a linear fit to the low count rate data approximated the ratio of the activities of the two sources, confirming the principle of the technique. The maximum observed count rate and the observed count rate at 20 % count loss were 9 % and 18 % lower with the variable-distance method compared to the copper attenuator method. Count rate performance measured by both methods was not well approximated by a simple paralyzable model.

Conclusions The copper attenuator method is quick and reliable but requires specialized test equipment. When the necessary copper filters are not available, the new variable-distance method provides a viable alternative

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gamma camera count rate performance assessment without specialized equipment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Gamma camera count rate performance assessment without specialized equipment
Martin Lodge, Richard Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2406;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gamma camera count rate performance assessment without specialized equipment
Martin Lodge, Richard Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2406;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

  • Optimizing multi-stage CdZnTe Compton camera for real-time proton range determination in proton radiotherapy
  • Optimized 82Rb infusion profile for flow quantification with low count-rate PET system using a physical flow phantom
  • Developing freehand PET - status and challenges
Show more MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire