Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive and Nonradioactive

Separation of Germanium-68 from irradiated targets

Jonathan Fitzsimmons, Leonard Mausner, Slawko Kurczak, Dmitri Medvedev and Cleveland Dodge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1482;
Jonathan Fitzsimmons
1Collider-Accelerator, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard Mausner
1Collider-Accelerator, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Slawko Kurczak
1Collider-Accelerator, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dmitri Medvedev
1Collider-Accelerator, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cleveland Dodge
1Collider-Accelerator, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1482

Objectives Germanium-68 has a half life of 270 days and decays to gallium-68 with a half life of 1.13 hours which makes the two isotopes ideal for a medical isotope generator. The short half life of gallium-68 allows preparation, purification and imaging of small molecules and peptides and the generator can be eluted multiple times in a day for patient imaging. The germanium-68 produced at Brookhaven Linac Isotope Producer from proton irradiation of liquid gallium metal targets has been purified in the past by liquid-liquid extraction using organic solvents such as carbon tetrachloride or toluene. The FDA has listed these solvents as Q3C - class 1 and 2 solvents in its Guidance for Industry documentation. This FDA classification places the solvents in a category that should not be employed in manufacturing of drugs due to unacceptable toxicity.

Methods A new separation process utilizing a common buffer system and commercially available resin was developed to separate germanium-68 from the irradiated gallium target. The soluble gallium allows a separation time of less than 3 hours.

Results The new process results in 82-99% recovery of germanium-68 with minimal to no zinc-65 and cobalt in the final product. The concentration of gallium in the final product in the new separation process is ~24 ppm which is half the amount of the concentration of gallium in the final product by organic extraction (~40 ppm average).

Conclusions The new process is being adapted for use in hot cells for production and purification of Ci amounts of germanium-68 to meet cGMP requirements.

Research Support U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Physic

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Separation of Germanium-68 from irradiated targets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Separation of Germanium-68 from irradiated targets
Jonathan Fitzsimmons, Leonard Mausner, Slawko Kurczak, Dmitri Medvedev, Cleveland Dodge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1482;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Separation of Germanium-68 from irradiated targets
Jonathan Fitzsimmons, Leonard Mausner, Slawko Kurczak, Dmitri Medvedev, Cleveland Dodge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1482;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive and Nonradioactive

  • Nonradioactive analytical methods for quantifying the modification ratio of antibody chelator conjugates (ACCs) with deferroxamine and DOTA
  • Routine production of 18F-fluorcholine
  • Quantitative assessment of Ge-68 breakthrough from a commercial titanium-dioxide based Ge-68/Ga-68 generator
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive and Nonradioactive

Special MTA: Automation & Technology Development Posters

  • Efficient GMP production of 68Ga-peptides on a commercial synthesizer using a 68Ge/68Ga generator with direct labelling
  • Automated production of [68Ga]Ga-DO3A-VS-Cys40-Exendin-4 for the Glucagonlike Peptide 1 Receptor imaging
  • Automated Synthesis of [18F](2S,4R)-4-fluoroglutamine on a GE FX-N Pro Module
Show more Special MTA: Automation & Technology Development Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire