Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Quantitative Preclinical Imaging of TSPO Expression in Glioma Using N,N-Diethyl-2-(2-(4-(2-18F-Fluoroethoxy)Phenyl)-5,7-Dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidin-3-yl)Acetamide

Dewei Tang, Matthew R. Hight, Eliot T. McKinley, Allie Fu, Jason R. Buck, R. Adam Smith, Mohammed Noor Tantawy, Todd E. Peterson, Daniel C. Colvin, M. Sib Ansari, Michael Nickels and H. Charles Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2012, 53 (2) 287-294; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.095653
Dewei Tang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew R. Hight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eliot T. McKinley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allie Fu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason R. Buck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Adam Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Noor Tantawy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd E. Peterson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel C. Colvin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Sib Ansari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Nickels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Charles Manning
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Chemical structure of DPA-714 (inset). Radioligand displacement of 3H-PK 11195 using DPA-714 in C6 glioma cell lysate (inhibitory concentration of 50%, 10.9 nM). conc = concentration.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) T2-weighted MR image of C6 glioma–bearing rat in right brain hemisphere. (B) Coronal PET image obtained from dynamic scan of 18F-DPA-714 PET (summed dynamic scan, 0–90 min). (C) 18F-DPA-714 time–activity curves for tumor (blue), contralateral brain (green), and plasma (red). (D) Transverse PET image obtained from dynamic scan of 18F-DPA-714 PET (summed dynamic scan, 0–90 min). (E) Standard hematoxylin and eosin staining of serial tissue section. (F) Immunohistochemistry analysis of TSPO expression in typical C6 glioma. Tumor location is indicated with arrows in images. %ID/cc = percentage injected dose per cubic centimeter.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    In vivo displacement of 18F-DPA-714 in C6 glioma–bearing rat. Relative 18F-DPA-714 uptake before (A) and after (B) intravenous infusion of excess of DPA-714. (C) 18F-DPA-714 time–activity curves generated for tumor (blue), contralateral brain (green), and plasma (red). %ID/cc = percentage injected dose per cubic centimeter.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Comparison of 18F-PBR06 and 18F-DPA-714 in same glioma-bearing rat. (A) T2-weighted MR image of rat bearing C6 glioma in right hemisphere. (B) 18F-DPA-714 PET image (summed dynamic scan over last 30 min). (C) 18F-PBR06 PET image (summed dynamic scan over last 30 min). (D) 18F-DPA-714 time–activity curves generated for tumor (blue), contralateral brain (green), and plasma (red). For comparison, 18F-PBR06 time–activity curves are shown in black. %ID/cc = percentage injected dose per cubic centimeter.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Pharmacokinetic model fit of typical 18F-DPA-714 time–activity curves to 3-compartment, 4-kinetic-parameter (A) and 2-compartment, 2-kinetic-parameter (B) models. Time–activity curves for tumor (blue), contralateral brain (green), and plasma (red) are shown with associated model fit. %ID/cc = percentage injected dose per cubic centimeter.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Representative graphical analysis of VT for a subject from this investigation. Fit was performed for normal brain (A) and for tumor (B). Solid gray line = linear regression (start time for linear regression, “t*”).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    HPLC Radiometabolite Analysis of 18F-DPA-714

    Time after injection (min)Percentage 18F-DPA-714Percentage 18F-fluoridePercentage metabolite
    2 (n = 7)95 ± 6.02 ± 3.33 ± 3.7
    12 (n = 7)68 ± 7.413 ± 6.719 ± 5.8
    30 (n = 7)44 ± 8.937 ± 5.419 ± 8.8
    60 (n = 7)27 ± 6.250 ± 15.023 ± 7.3
    90 (n = 5)22 ± 17.864 ± 12.114 ± 3.8
    • Data are mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Parameter Estimations for 18F-DPA-714 Uptake

    Tissue typeK1/k2 (mL/g)k3/k4VT (mL/g)*VT (mL/g)†VT (mL/g)†%ID/cc
    Tumor (n = 11)6.867 ± 1.2268.913 ± 1.15570.033 ± 14.72957.44 ± 11.7420.331 ± 0.036
    Brain (n = 11)3.619 ± 0.5514.024 ± 0.84215.963 ± 3.56614.57 ± 2.8230.088 ± 0.011
    P0.07620.00210.00170.0029<0.0001
    • ↵* From kinetic parameters.

    • ↵† From graphical analysis.

    • Data are mean ± SEM.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 53 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue 2
February 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Preclinical Imaging of TSPO Expression in Glioma Using N,N-Diethyl-2-(2-(4-(2-18F-Fluoroethoxy)Phenyl)-5,7-Dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidin-3-yl)Acetamide
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantitative Preclinical Imaging of TSPO Expression in Glioma Using N,N-Diethyl-2-(2-(4-(2-18F-Fluoroethoxy)Phenyl)-5,7-Dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidin-3-yl)Acetamide
Dewei Tang, Matthew R. Hight, Eliot T. McKinley, Allie Fu, Jason R. Buck, R. Adam Smith, Mohammed Noor Tantawy, Todd E. Peterson, Daniel C. Colvin, M. Sib Ansari, Michael Nickels, H. Charles Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2012, 53 (2) 287-294; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095653

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantitative Preclinical Imaging of TSPO Expression in Glioma Using N,N-Diethyl-2-(2-(4-(2-18F-Fluoroethoxy)Phenyl)-5,7-Dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidin-3-yl)Acetamide
Dewei Tang, Matthew R. Hight, Eliot T. McKinley, Allie Fu, Jason R. Buck, R. Adam Smith, Mohammed Noor Tantawy, Todd E. Peterson, Daniel C. Colvin, M. Sib Ansari, Michael Nickels, H. Charles Manning
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2012, 53 (2) 287-294; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095653
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • TSPO-targeted PET and Optical Probes for the Detection and Localization of Premalignant and Malignant Pancreatic Lesions
  • Combined PET Imaging of the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment Identifies Margins of Unique Radiotracer Uptake
  • Imaging Microglial Activation with TSPO PET: Lighting Up Neurologic Diseases?
  • TSPO as a target for glioblastoma therapeutics
  • The 18-kDa Mitochondrial Translocator Protein in Human Gliomas: An 11C-(R)PK11195 PET Imaging and Neuropathology Study
  • Glial Activation in the Early Stages of Brain Metastasis: TSPO as a Diagnostic Biomarker
  • The Translocator Protein Radioligand 18F-DPA-714 Monitors Antitumor Effect of Erufosine in a Rat 9L Intracranial Glioma Model
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire