Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

The incidence of clinically important PET-negative CT-positive findings in a large clinical PET/CT practice

Tanche Wang, Jonathan Abele and Johnny Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 69;
Tanche Wang
1Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Abele
1Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johnny Li
1Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

69

Objectives The objective of this study is to determine the incidence of clinically important incidental PET-negative CT-positive findings in a large clinical PET/CT population.

Methods Retrospective study of patients who have had PET/CT scans performed at University of Alberta Hospital since January, 2007. All physicians who have reviewed these studies are active specialists in both nuclear medicine and diagnostic radiology, as defined by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Numerous clinical parameters were entered into a clinical database, including the presence of incidental PET negative CT positive findings felt to be clinically significant by the reviewing physician. Data was retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence of PET negative CT positive findings felt to be clinically significant by the initial interpreting physician. Clinically important findings were categorized into very urgent management (within 2 weeks), moderately urgent management (2-6 weeks), non-urgent management (> 6 weeks).

Results This ongoing study has evaluated 501 patients and 47% of cases contained a PET negative CT positive finding. Eight percent of the PET negative CT positive findings were considered very urgent. The percentage of PET negative CT positive findings demonstrated a clear upward trend from patients in the third to eighth decade. The age categories under the third decade may be statistically affected by low scan numbers. The percent of studies with PET negative CT positive findings were about 50% for all the indications except for melanoma. This may relate to a lower average patient age for melanoma cases. The distribution of PET negative CT positive findings according to urgency was similar between interpreting physicians.

Conclusions Clinically significant PET-negative CT-positive findings were found in 47% of cases and in 8% of cases these were felt to be urgent.

Research Support This study was funded by the Vessie Heckbert Memorial Summer Research Award from the University of Alberta

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The incidence of clinically important PET-negative CT-positive findings in a large clinical PET/CT practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The incidence of clinically important PET-negative CT-positive findings in a large clinical PET/CT practice
Tanche Wang, Jonathan Abele, Johnny Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 69;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The incidence of clinically important PET-negative CT-positive findings in a large clinical PET/CT practice
Tanche Wang, Jonathan Abele, Johnny Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 69;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • How global age of rhTSH fits into local cost-benefits
  • Comparison of recombinant TSH-stimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) test, I-131 SPECT/CT, and FDG PET/CT in anti-Tg antibodies (TgAb) positive thyroid cancer
  • Review of utilization of surveillance scans in lymphoma patients: A pilot study
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • Is FDG PET/CT cost-effective for pre-operation staging of potentially operative non-small cell lung cancer? From Chinese healthcare system perspective
  • Comparison of PET vs MRI for evaluation of treated high grade primary brain tumors
  • SPECT-CT in routine clinical use: Increment in patient radiation dose compared to SPECT alone
Show more Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire