Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

SPECT-CT in routine clinical use: Increment in patient radiation dose compared to SPECT alone

Shekhar Sharma, Punit Sharma, Rama Reddy, Sanjana Ballal, Rakesh Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal and Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 477;
Shekhar Sharma
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Punit Sharma
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rama Reddy
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjana Ballal
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Kumar
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chandrasekhar Bal
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arun Malhotra
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

477

Objectives To assess the increment in patient radiation dose in routine nuclear medicine imaging due to addition of single photon emission tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT).

Methods Data of 340 consecutive patients (Age: 38.2±19.8 years; Male: Female-168/172) who had underwent nuclear medicine imaging along with SPECT-CT of a selected volume was retrospectively evaluated. The dose of injected radiopharmaceutical (MBq) was noted and the effective dose (mSv) was calculated as per ICRP guidelines. The CTDIvol and dose length product (DLP) of the CT were also assessed using standard phantoms. The effective dose (mSv) due to CT was calculated as the product of DLP and a correction factor depending on the region of investigation, using standard guidelines. The dose for CT was compared among different groups. The increment in effective dose was calculated as CT dose expressed as a percentage of radiopharmaceutical (RP) dose.

Results The findings are summarized in Table. The increment was higher for bone scintigraphy compared to parathyroid scintigraphy (p<0.0001), ECD scan (p<0.0001), GHA scan (p<0.0001). Similarly, the increment for GHA scan as compared to ECD (p<0.0001) and MIBI scan (p=0.0004).

Conclusions Addition of CT to nuclear medicine imaging in form of SPECT-CT can significantly increase the patient radiation dose, with CT dose exceeding the RP dose in many instances. This is most marked for bone scan. Hence, SPECT-CT should be used only when absolutely necessary

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SPECT-CT in routine clinical use: Increment in patient radiation dose compared to SPECT alone
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
SPECT-CT in routine clinical use: Increment in patient radiation dose compared to SPECT alone
Shekhar Sharma, Punit Sharma, Rama Reddy, Sanjana Ballal, Rakesh Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 477;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
SPECT-CT in routine clinical use: Increment in patient radiation dose compared to SPECT alone
Shekhar Sharma, Punit Sharma, Rama Reddy, Sanjana Ballal, Rakesh Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 477;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • Evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the workup of infective endocarditis
  • The Metabolic Superscan
  • FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, complications, and treatment response
Show more General Clinical Specialties

Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • A new complex diagnostic protocol for the diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Simultaneous dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy using SPECT/CT
  • A systematic literature review of clinical comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence for PET in oncology
  • Is FDG PET/CT cost-effective for pre-operation staging of potentially operative non-small cell lung cancer? From Chinese healthcare system perspective
Show more Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire