Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

Statistical modeling of the PET maximum voxel

J. Bading, P. Frankel, H. Bertilsson, G. Lopatin and Andrew Raubitschek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2093;
J. Bading
1City of Hope, Duarte, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Frankel
1City of Hope, Duarte, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Bertilsson
2Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Lopatin
1City of Hope, Duarte, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Raubitschek
1City of Hope, Duarte, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2093

Objectives Maximum voxel image intensity (MVx) or SUV is often used to measure tumor uptake in PET. To better understand MVx reproducibility and dependence on noise and region-of-interest (ROI) size, we modeled MVx measurement assuming log-normal (LN) distributed single-voxel image intensities (Vx) and tested the model with a uniform phantom.

Methods PET-CT scans of a cylindrical Cu-64, water phantom were acquired in list mode, divided into multiple frames and reconstructed by OSEM with post smoothing (resolution 7 mm). Frame duration and activity concentration were varied to obtain a wide noise range. MVx, average Vx (AVx) and Vx standard deviation [SD(Vx)] were determined for multiple, circular ROIs centered a fixed distance from the coregistered phantom-scanner axis. Data for each ROI were averaged over 8-10 frames, and multiple equivalent ROIs were used to estimate expectation values (E) for MVx/AVx, MVx coefficient of variation [CV(MVx)], SD(Vx) and SD(AVx). E[SD(Vx)] and E[SD(AVx)] were in turn used to calculate the square root of the diagonal elements (sigma) of the ROI image covariance matrix and NI, the number of effectively independent observations per ROI. Monte Carlo simulations of E[MVx/AVx] and E[CV(MVx)] were performed for measured E[sigma/AVx],E[NI] combinations by recording maximum Vx for NI random samples from a LN distribution of unity median and logarithmic variance corresponding to E[sigma/AVx] (10,000 repeats). The model was tested for 5 combinations of noise [E(sigma/AVx) range 0.20 to 0.53] and ROI diameter (range 10-40mm).

Results As noise increased, the model increasingly underestimated E[MVx/AVx] [mean relative error (MRE) -10%, range -3 to -22%] and overestimated E[CV(MVx)] [MRE 20%, range 9 to 36%]. Notably, measured Vx distributions departed increasingly from LN shape with increasing noise.

Conclusions The LN model qualitatively reproduced MVx noise and ROI size dependencies, but underestimated average MVx and overestimated MVx random variability. We are seeking alternative models

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Statistical modeling of the PET maximum voxel
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Statistical modeling of the PET maximum voxel
J. Bading, P. Frankel, H. Bertilsson, G. Lopatin, Andrew Raubitschek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2093;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Statistical modeling of the PET maximum voxel
J. Bading, P. Frankel, H. Bertilsson, G. Lopatin, Andrew Raubitschek
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2093;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

  • Comparing FDG quantification in tumors with the retention fraction and SUV in a dual scan examination after 60 and 90 minutes
  • Usefulness of dynamic FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of liver tumor
  • Variations in SUV values with reconstruction algorithms
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

Data Analysis and Management Posters

  • Extension of the MIAKAT analysis software package to non-brain and pre-clinical PET analysis.
  • Robustness of radiomic features in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: impact of parameter settings on different feature matrices
  • Automated Internal Dosimetry Research Tool Using Quantitative SPECT for the Lu177 Theranostic Application
Show more Data Analysis and Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire