Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Influence of septal penetration and scatter on 123I SPECT detector response modeling

Jonathan Moody, Yuni Dewaraja, Jeffrey Fessler and Edward Ficaro
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2012;
Jonathan Moody
1INVIA, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuni Dewaraja
2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Fessler
2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Ficaro
1INVIA, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2012

Objectives Septal penetration of high energy (HE) photons is a well-known problem for LEHR collimation of cardiac 123I SPECT, which can be addressed by modeling detector response in the reconstruction. This work evaluated the relative contributions of septal penetration (SP) and scatter correction (SC) to 3D-OSEM reconstruction using 3 different detector response models.

Methods Projections of an 123I point source in air were acquired at various detector distances (Siemens Symbia SPECT/CT, LEHR collimator). The data were fit to 3 analytic functions [gauss (G), gauss+exp (SP1), and gauss+exp+exp(exp) (SP2)] to model the geometric and penetration components of a depth-dependent PSF, which was then included in a 3D-OSEM reconstruction program. Three 123I phantom datasets were acquired: point source in a cold water cylinder, and torso phantom with heart/lung/liver inserts and 2 sets of activity ratios (H:Lu:Liv:BG): 20:5:10:1 (P1), 15:8:10:1 (P2). All datasets included a 20% photopeak and 6% windows adjacent to the main peak for triple energy window SC. Each dataset was reconstructed 6 ways: with/without SC and using the 3 PSF models. The images were assessed by maximizing the contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) between the heart wall/ventricle with respect to OSEM iteration.

Results The SP1 model gave adequate fits within a radius of ~12cm of the PSF center, while SP2 provided better fits out to a radius of 31cm. The CNR results are summarized below. The point source FWHM and FWTM was unchanged when SP1 or SP2 was included in the reconstruction.

Conclusions In these phantom studies, including septal penetration with the geometric component of an 123I detector response model contributed the same percent improvement to cardiac CNR (25-35%) as SC. A model that included the central ~40% of the penetration tails was as effective as a model that included the entire tails. A smaller PSF model may reduce reconstruction time while providing adequate compensation for detector response.

Research Support NIH Grant 1R43HL10333

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of septal penetration and scatter on 123I SPECT detector response modeling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Influence of septal penetration and scatter on 123I SPECT detector response modeling
Jonathan Moody, Yuni Dewaraja, Jeffrey Fessler, Edward Ficaro
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2012;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Influence of septal penetration and scatter on 123I SPECT detector response modeling
Jonathan Moody, Yuni Dewaraja, Jeffrey Fessler, Edward Ficaro
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2012;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Usefulness of high-definition PET reconstruction in pulmonary nodules
  • Intuitive method for improving the quality of Patlak parametric images of FDG and FLT
  • Direct 4D parametric image reconstruction for dynamic cardiac PET imaging
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • On Enhancing Monte-Carlo Scatter Correction for Y90 Bremsstrahlung SPECT using Guided Filtering
  • Data-driven rigid motion correction of PET brain images using list mode reconstruction
  • Simultaneous Attenuation Correction and Reconstruction of PET Images Using Deep Convolutional Encoder Decoder Networks from Emission Data
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire