Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Treatment with Octreotide Does Not Reduce Tumor Uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as Measured by PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Alexander R. Haug, Axel Rominger, Mona Mustafa, Christoph Auernhammer, Burkhard Göke, Gerwin P. Schmidt, Björn Wängler, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein and Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2011, 52 (11) 1679-1683; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.089276
Alexander R. Haug
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Rominger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona Mustafa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Auernhammer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Burkhard Göke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerwin P. Schmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Björn Wängler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Cumming
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Bartenstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Hacker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Axial views and multiple-intensity projections of 2 PET/CT scans from same patient: scan under treatment with long-acting octreotide (A) and scan without treatment (B). Although SUVmax of metastases was not different (32.9 and 31.6 with and without treatment, respectively), uptake of both spleen (20.2 and 25.3, respectively) and liver (9.5 and 11.5, respectively) was notably lower under long-acting octreotide treatment. Between the 2 examinations, no disease progression was evident and no treatment was performed.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    SUVmax measurements of tumor with highest value per patient. Mann–Whitney U test revealed no difference between groups with and without octreotide medication (P = 0.70).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    SUVmax measurements of liver. Mann–Whitney U test revealed significantly lower SUVmax in group with octreotide treatment than in group without (P < 0.001).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    SUVmax measurements of up to 5 tumors per organ and patient in subgroup of 9 patients with successive PET scans with and without octreotide medication. Wilcoxon test revealed no statistical difference (P = 0.93).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Demographics and Tumor Sites for Treated and Untreated Patients

    ParameterOctreotide (n = 35)No octreotide (n = 70)P
    Sex
     Male18 (51.4%)38 (54.3%)NS
     Female17 (48.6%)32 (45.7%)
    Age55.7 ± 13.758.8 ± 12.0NS
    Primary tumorNS
     Ileum26 (74.3%)23 (32.9%)
     Lung2 (5.7%)8 (11.4%)
     Pancreas3 (8.6%)11 (15.7%)
     Stomach1 (2.8%)3 (4.3%)
     Rectum2 (5.7%)2 (2.9%)
     Other1 (2.8%)23 (32.9%)
    Primary tumor present2 (6%)11 (16%)NS
    Metastases
     Total35 (100%)34 (49%)<0.001
     Liver28 (80%)28 (40%)<0.001
     Lymph node24 (69%)19 (27%)<0.001
     Bone17 (49%)9 (13%)<0.001
     Pulmonary0 (0%)2 (3%)NS
    • NS = not statistically significant.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    SUVmax and SUVmean of Organs, Primary Tumors, and Metastases in Treated and Untreated Patients

    ParameterOctreotideNo octreotideP
    Most intense metastases per patient
     SUVmax32.5 ± 16.6 (10.8–70.1)33.0 ± 23.0 (6.3–117.1)0.73
     SUVmean11.2 ± 6.8 (3.7–25.6)10.6 ± 5.1 (3.6–21.8)0.83
    Primary tumor
     SUVmax28.6 ± 6.8 (23.8–33.4)32.9 ± 31.5 (6.3–117.1)0.69
     SUVmean19.8 ± 6.7 (15.1–24.5)21.3 ± 19.5 (4.1–72.7)0.55
    Liver metastases
     SUVmax27.2 ± 14.8 (8.1–66.4)25.7 ± 10.7 (9.8–56.8)0.92
     SUVmean18.5 ± 10.7 (5.2–46.3)16.9 ± 7.5 (6.9–39.9)0.83
    Lymph node metastases
     SUVmax41.4 ± 19.5 (5.6–68.8)25.0 ± 6.3 (18.1–33.0)0.20
     SUVmean27.1 ± 13.1 (3.6–45.7)16.4 ± 4.8 (11.2–22.0)0.17
    Osseous metastases
     SUVmax39.5 ± 22.0 (11.5–70.1)15.4 ± 7.8 (10.2–27.0)0.49
     SUVmean26.9 ± 15.7 (6.6–48.6)10.2 ± 5.1 (6.7–17.8)0.38
    Lung metastases
     SUVmaxNone21.4 ± 11.0 (13.7–29.2)NA
     SUVmeanNone14.0 ± 7.1 (9.0–19.0)NA
    Liver
     SUVmax7.1 ± 2.1 (3.5–11.9)9.3 ± 2.9 (3.7–19.2)<0.001
     SUVmean4.9 ± 1.4 (2.8–7.4)6.6 ± 1.9 (2.8–12.8)<0.001
    Spleen
     SUVmax18.4 ± 6.4 (9.5–31.8)24.9 ± 6.7 (10.4–43.8)<0.001
     SUVmean12.8 ± 4.4 (6.4–23.5)18.2 ± 5.0 (7.2–32.8)<0.001
    Adrenal gland
     SUVmax18.3 ± 5.7 (9.4–28.0)20.0 ± 5.6 (10.1–41.2)0.70
     SUVmean11.7 ± 3.7 (6.0–17.7)14.9 ± 16.4 (7.2–18.5)0.76
    Pituitary gland
     SUVmax3.9 ± 4.8 (0.4–19.3)2.0 ± 0.8 (0.5–3.5)0.12
     SUVmean2.6 ± 3.2 (0.3–13.0)1.3 ± 0.5 (0.3–2.4)0.08
    Kidney
     SUVmax14.5 ± 6.0 (5.9–31.0)15.8 ± 4.6 (8.3–35.0)0.24
     SUVmean9.5 ± 3.3 (4.1–17.3)10.4 ± 2.8 (5.4–22.5)0.32
    • NA = not applicable.

    • Data are mean ± SD, with range in parentheses.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 52 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue 11
November 1, 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment with Octreotide Does Not Reduce Tumor Uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as Measured by PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Treatment with Octreotide Does Not Reduce Tumor Uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as Measured by PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Alexander R. Haug, Axel Rominger, Mona Mustafa, Christoph Auernhammer, Burkhard Göke, Gerwin P. Schmidt, Björn Wängler, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2011, 52 (11) 1679-1683; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089276

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Treatment with Octreotide Does Not Reduce Tumor Uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE as Measured by PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Alexander R. Haug, Axel Rominger, Mona Mustafa, Christoph Auernhammer, Burkhard Göke, Gerwin P. Schmidt, Björn Wängler, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2011, 52 (11) 1679-1683; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089276
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effects of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs on 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapy Differentially Alters 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Normal Tissues Compared with Primary Tumors and Metastatic Lesions
  • Current Concepts in 68Ga-DOTATATE Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Interpretation, Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Molecular Strategies
  • Prospective Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Unknown Primary Sites
  • Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on the Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Referring Physician's Perspective
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Intrapatient Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE: Net Uptake Rate for Accurate Quantification
  • Free Somatostatin Receptor Fraction Predicts the Antiproliferative Effect of Octreotide in a Neuroendocrine Tumor Model: Implications for Dose Optimization
  • Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire