Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communication

Electrocardiogram-Gated 18F-FDG PET/CT Hybrid Imaging in Patients with Unsatisfactory Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Initial Clinical Results

Christopher Uebleis, Michael Ulbrich, Roland Tegtmeyer, Franziska Schuessler, Nadine Haserueck, Johannes Siebermair, Christoph Becker, Stephan Nekolla, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Stefan Kääb and Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2011, 52 (1) 67-71; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.078709
Christopher Uebleis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Ulbrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Tegtmeyer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska Schuessler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Haserueck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Siebermair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Becker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Nekolla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Cumming
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Bartenstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Kääb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Hacker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    LV lead position in viable myocardium. CT and 3D fused 18F-FDG PET/CT image of patient 5, who was rated as responder to CRT. Image shows attenuation-corrected CT images, with leads of both implantable cardioverter defibrillator and biventricular pacemaker in yellow and PET information in green. There is no relevant scar burden close to catheter lead in lateral wall of left ventricle. Right ventricle is enlarged and shows slight 18F-FDG uptake. Tips of pacemaker leads are marked with arrows. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    LV lead position in nonviable myocardium. CT and 3D fused PET/CT image of patient 13, who was rated as nonresponder to CRT. Image shows attenuation-corrected CT images, with leads of biventricular pacemaker in yellow and PET information in green. Huge amount of left ventricle, especially lateral wall where tip of LV lead was located, shows absent glucose metabolism. right ventricle shows slight 18F-FDG uptake. Catheter leads are marked with arrows. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Shown are phase histogram (left) and bull's eye (right) of LV glucose metabolism (upper polar map) and global phase entropy (lower polar map) in relation to LV pacemaker lead position in nonresponder (patient 2; A) and responder (patient 5; B) to CRT. Compared with responder patient, nonresponder shows broader bandwidth in phase histogram and LV lead located in area of nonviable myocardium and high phase entropy.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Baseline Characteristics for Study Cohort and Subcohorts of Responders and Nonresponders

    ParameterAll patients (n = 14)Responders (n = 7)Nonresponders (n = 7)P
    Age (y)67.9 ± 8.468.0 ± 8.867.7 ± 8.7NS
    Men12 (86)6 (86)6 (86)NS
    Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor13 (93)7 (100)6 (86)NS
    β-blocker13 (93)6 (86)7 (100)NS
    Diuretics10 (71)4 (57)6 (86)NS
    Aldosterone receptor antagonist8 (57)4 (50)4 (50)NS
    Clinical evaluation
     NYHA class before CRT3.0 ± 0.03.0 ± 0.03.0 ± 0.0NS
     NYHA class after CRT2.6 ± 0.62.0 ± 0.03.1 ± 0.4<0.05
     Δ NYHA class*−0.4 ± 0.6−1.0 ± 0.3+0.1 ± 0.4<0.05
     Brain natriuretic peptide before CRT (pg/mL)625 ± 514691 ± 582560 ± 473NS
     Brain natriuretic peptide after CRT (pg/mL)432 ± 533236 ± 257628 ± 679NS
     Δ Brain natriuretic peptide (pg/mL)−193 ± 467−454 ± 416+68 ± 373<0.05
    Echocardiographic parameters
     LVEF before CRT (%)25 ± 824 ± 927 ± 8NS
     LVEF after CRT (%)32 ± 1339 ± 1426 ± 8NS
     Δ LVEF (%)+7 ± 12+15 ± 11−1 ± 7<0.05
     LVESV before CRT (mL)219 ± 57231 ± 64206 ± 52NS
     LVESV after therapy (mL)177 ± 65150 ± 51205 ± 700.073
     Δ LVESV (mL)*−41 ± 51−82 ± 37+1 ± 24<0.05
    Residual dyssynchrony7 (50)2 (29)5 (71)
    PET/CT including phase analysis
     Scar burden (%)20 ± 1910 ± 830 ± 21<0.05
     Lead over scar4 (29)0 (0)4 (57)
     Bandwidth (°)90 ± 3891 ± 2889 ± 48NS
     Phase SD (°)38 ± 1142 ± 834 ± 14NS
     Phase entropy (°)80 ± 577 ± 483 ± 3<0.05
    • ↵* Prespecified response criteria.

    • NS = not significant.

    • Values are expressed as n, with percentages in parentheses, or mean ± SD.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Table 1
    • Supplemental Video
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 52 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue 1
January 1, 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Electrocardiogram-Gated 18F-FDG PET/CT Hybrid Imaging in Patients with Unsatisfactory Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Initial Clinical Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Electrocardiogram-Gated 18F-FDG PET/CT Hybrid Imaging in Patients with Unsatisfactory Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Initial Clinical Results
Christopher Uebleis, Michael Ulbrich, Roland Tegtmeyer, Franziska Schuessler, Nadine Haserueck, Johannes Siebermair, Christoph Becker, Stephan Nekolla, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Stefan Kääb, Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2011, 52 (1) 67-71; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078709

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Electrocardiogram-Gated 18F-FDG PET/CT Hybrid Imaging in Patients with Unsatisfactory Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Initial Clinical Results
Christopher Uebleis, Michael Ulbrich, Roland Tegtmeyer, Franziska Schuessler, Nadine Haserueck, Johannes Siebermair, Christoph Becker, Stephan Nekolla, Paul Cumming, Peter Bartenstein, Stefan Kääb, Marcus Hacker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2011, 52 (1) 67-71; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078709
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cardiac Simulation to Personalize Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: past, present and future
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
  • Bioanalytic Hybrid System Merging 3-Dimensional Cell Culture and Chromatographic Precision for Unprecedented Preclinical Insights in Molecular Imaging
  • Radiances of Cerenkov-Emitting Radionuclides on the In Vivo Imaging System
Show more BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire