Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleMultimodality Molecular Imaging of the Cardiovascular System

Approaches to Multimodality Imaging of Angiogenesis

Lawrence W. Dobrucki, Ebo D. de Muinck, Jonathan R. Lindner and Albert J. Sinusas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (Supplement 1) 66S-79S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.074963
Lawrence W. Dobrucki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ebo D. de Muinck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan R. Lindner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Sinusas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Analysis of wild-type (eNOS+/+) and eNOS-deficient (eNOS−/−, or knockout) mice. (A) Representative micro-SPECT/CT images of eNOS+/+ and eNOS−/− mice injected with 99mTc-NC100692 at baseline and at 7 d and 4 wk after right femoral artery ligation. Yellow arrows indicate ischemic regions with increased 99mTc-NC100692 retention. Less retention was seen in eNOS−/− mice. (B) Serial micro-SPECT/CT images were analyzed, and ischemic-to-nonischemic 99mTc-NC100692 activity ratios were calculated. Significant (P < 0.05) increase in 99mTc-NC100692 retention was seen in ischemic leg at 7 d after surgery in both groups. However, significantly less retention was seen at 7 d in eNOS−/− mice than in wild-type mice. *P < 0.05 for eNOS−/− mice vs. wild-type mice; #P < 0.05 for value at 7 d vs. value at baseline. (Reprinted from (22).)

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    (A) In vivo micro-SPECT/CT images of 201Tl perfusion (top row, green) and 99mTc-NC100692 (middle row, red) in IGF-1 rat at 4 wk after myocardial infarction were reconstructed in short axis, horizontal long axis, and vertical long axis and fused (bottom row) with reference contrast CT image (gray scale). All rats had anterolateral 201Tl perfusion defect (yellow solid arrows) and focal uptake of 99mTc-NC100692 in defect area after myocardial infarction. Contrast agent permitted better definition of myocardium and allowed differentiation of focal myocardial uptake of targeted radiotracer from uptake within chest wall at thoracotomy site (yellow dashed arrow). (B) Representative circumferential count profile of middle myocardial section of IGF-1 rat at 4 wk after myocardial infarction. Count profiles for both 99mTc-NC100692 (•) and 201Tl perfusion (○) are shown. %ID/g = percentage injected dose per gram. (Reprinted with permission of (24).)

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Noninvasive SPECT of angiogenesis in patient after percutaneous coronary intervention after myocardial infarction. After injection of αvβ3-integrin–targeted agent (99mTc-NC100692) 3 wk after myocardial infarction, focal signal enhancement (arrowheads) was noted in short-axis (A) and long-axis (B) views of infarct zone and confirmed by corresponding 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI) perfusion images. (Reprinted with permission of (27). Images courtesy of Drs. Johan Verjans and Leonard Hofstra, University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.)

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Cardiac MRI with delayed enhancement (arrows) extending from anterior wall to apical region in 4-chamber (A) and 2-chamber (D) views. Identically reproduced location and geometry with severely reduced myocardial blood flow obtained with 13N-ammonia, corresponding to regions of delayed enhancement on cardiac MRI (arrows) (B and E). Focal 18F-RGD signal colocalized to infarcted area. This signal may reflect angiogenesis within healing area (arrows) (C and F). LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle. (Reprinted with permission of (28).)

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Noninvasive PET/CT images of angiogenesis induced by hind-limb ischemia in murine model. (A) Nontargeted dendritic nanoprobes (bottom center). (B) Uptake of αvβ3-targeted dendritic nanoprobes was higher in ischemic hind limb (left side of image) than in control hind limb (right side of image). (Reprinted with permission of (30).)

  • FIGURE 6. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6. 

    Examples of color-coded CEU images reflecting retention fraction of integrin-targeted microbubbles in control and ischemic proximal hind-limb adductor muscles from untreated (A) and FGF 2–treated (B) rat 4 d after iliac artery ligation. Color scales are shown at bottom. (Reprinted with permission of (38).)

  • FIGURE 7. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7. 

    Contrast ultrasound imaging of angiogenic endothelial cell phenotype in chronic limb ischemia. (A) High-frequency (30-MHz) 3D ultrasound rendering of mouse hind limb with single short-axis elevational plane (bottom) showing region of proximal (Prox) adductor muscle group (arrows). Dist = distal. (B) Perfusion imaging data from adductor muscle group before and after iliac ligation in which product of rate constant and plateau intensity of curves denotes blood flow and is reduced by 80% during acute ischemia but improves to 20% of normal by 21 d. (C) Molecular imaging with microbubbles targeted to kinase insert domain receptor (VEGFR-2) and to P-selectin at day 3 after production of ischemia.

  • FIGURE 8. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8. 

    Angiogenesis induced in cholesterol (Chol)-fed rabbits. Aortic cross sections were imaged at 1.5 T with αvβ3-integrin–targeted nanoparticles. Note heterogeneous distribution in aortic cross sections (false colored contrast enhancement) but little enhancement in nontargeted rabbits (αvβ3−) or rabbits on standard diet (Chol−). diaph = diaphragm; mid = mid-aorta. (Reprinted with permission of (56).)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Selected Operational Parameters, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Modalities Used in Molecular Imaging

    ModalityProbesSpatial resolution (mm)Sensitivity (mol/L)AdvantagesDisadvantages
    PETPositron emitters (18F, 15O, 13N, 11C, 64Cu, 76Br)1–210−11−10−12Superior sensitivity; tracer chemically identical to parent compound; established attenuation correction algorithmsShort–half-life tracers; expensive equipment; requirement for on-site cyclotron; advanced radiochemistry
    SPECTPhoton emitters (201Tl, 99mTc, 111In, 125I)0.5–210−10−10−11Superior sensitivity; multiple-isotope imaging; emission proportional to concentration of probeExposure to ionizing radiation; accuracy limited by attenuation of low-energy photons
    UltrasoundMicrobubbles0.05–0.5To be determinedWidely available; relatively inexpensive; no ionizing radiationLimited penetration depth; lack of molecular probes
    CTIodinated contrast agents0.05–0.210−3−10−5Absorption proportional to concentration of contrast agent; superior spatial resolutionExposure to ionizing radiation; contrast agent nephrotoxicity; low sensitivity
    MRIGadolinium chelates, iron oxides0.02–0.110−3−10−5No ionizing radiation; superior spatial resolution; available instrumentationLow sensitivity; susceptibility to motion artifacts; lack of molecular probes
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Selected Targeted Probes for Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis

    MarkerProbeModalityBiologic target or applicationReference
    VEGF124I-VG76ePETTumor angiogenesisCollingridge et al. (5)
    123I-VEGF165SPECTTumor angiogenesisLi et al. (6)
    111In-VEGF121SPECTPeripheral limb angiogenesisLu et al. (63)
    64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121PETTumor angiogenesisCai et al. (7)
    64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121PETMyocardial angiogenesisRodriquez-Porcel et al. (8)
    99mTc-scVEGFSPECTPeripheral limb angiogenesisLevashova et al. (10)
    64Cu-scVEGFPETTumor angiogenesisBacker et al. (9)
    Anti-VEGFR2 antibodyUltrasoundTumor angiogenesisWillmann et al. (40)
    αvβ3111In-RP748SPECTTumor angiogenesisHarris et al. (14)
    Myocardial angiogenesisMeoli et al. (16)
    18F-AH111585PETTumor angiogenesisKenny et al. (64), Morrison et al. (65)
    123I-RGDSPECTMyocardial angiogenesisJohnson et al. (66)
    125I-c(RGD(I)yV)SPECTPeripheral limb angiogenesisLee et al. (67)
    99mTc-NC100692SPECTPeripheral limb angiogenesisHua et al. (21)
    Myocardial angiogenesisLindsey et al. (23)
    18F-NC100717PETAngiogenic tumor vasculatureIndrevoll et al. (68)
    11C-NC100717PETAngiogenic tumor vasculatureIndrevoll et al. (68)
    76Br-nanoparticlesPETPeripheral limb angiogenesisAlmutairi et al. (30)
    Echistatin microbubblesUltrasoundTumor angiogenesisEllegala et al. (36)
    Peripheral angiogenesisLeong-Poi et al. (37,38)
    RRL microbubblesUltrasoundTumor angiogenesisWeller et al. (39)
    LM609 antibodyMRITumor angiogenesisSipkins et al. (12)
    RGD-liposomal nanoparticlesMRIAngiogenesisKluza et al. (48)
    RGD-SPIO nanoparticlesMRITumor angiogenesisZhang et al. (50)
    RGD-cross-linked iron oxide-Cy5.5MRITumor angiogenesisMontet et al. (51)
    CD13/aminopeptidase N quantum dotsMRITumor angiogenesisOostendorp et al. (57)
    • scVEGF = single-chain VEGF.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Quantitative Methods for MR Spectroscopy

    Chemical nucleusBiologic processModel systemMolecular targetLigandParticleQuantification methodsValidation of binding of molecular target
    19F (53)Atherosclerotic plaque thrombosisBlood clot in vitro, plaque ex vivoFibrinMonoclonal antibodyPerfluorocarbon in lipid capsule with Gd chelatesSpectroscopy normalized to signal intensity standard; calculation of no. of bound particles from integrated 19F signal and calibration curvesLocalization of 19F spectrum to clot by overlay with 1H MRI and to plaque by overlay with optical image
    19F (54)Inflammation of endothelial cellsKidneys from hypercholesterolemic mice imaged ex vivoVCAM-1VHPKQHRGGSGC peptidePerfluorocarbon in lipid capsule with Gd chelatesSpectroscopy normalized to signal intensity standard; conversion to no. of nanoparticles/g of tissue from standard curve of relevant spectraCompetitive blockade of binding in vitro; VCAM-1 staining by IHC; comparison of fluorescence from nanoparticles with VCAM-1 by IHC
    • IHC = immunohistochemistry.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Quantitative Methods for T1- or T2-Weighted MRI

    Contrast agentBiologic processModel systemMolecular targetLigandParticleQuantification methodValidation method
    Gd (55)Atherosclerotic plaque angiogenesisAtherosclerotic NZW rabbitsαvβ3-integrinRGD peptidomimetic agentPerfluorocarbon in lipid capsule with Gd chelatesRelaxivity normalized to signal intensity standard, expressed as % enhancement compared with baselineCompetitive blockade of binding in vivo; demonstration of αvβ3-integrin on plaque capillaries by IHC
    Gd (57)Tumor angiogenesisTumor-bearing miceCD13/aminopeptidase NNGR peptideQuantum dot with Gd chelatesRelaxivity normalized to Gd content measured by mass spectrometry, expressed as % enhancement compared with baselineCompetitive blockade of binding in vivo; fluorescence intensity and colocalization with endothelial cells ex vivo
    SPIO (52)Lipoprotein metabolismWild-type, ApoE−/−, and LDL receptor−/− miceHepatocyte lipoprotein receptorApoE and lipoprotein lipaseSPIO embedded in lipoproteinRelaxivity normalized to radioactivity from radiolabeled SPIO nanoparticlesLocalization of SPIO nanoparticles and quantum dot nanoparticles in hepatocytes; studies with ApoE−/− and LDL receptor−/− mice
    • NZW = New Zealand White; IHC = immunohistochemistry; LDL = low-density lipoprotein.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (Supplement 1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue Supplement 1
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Approaches to Multimodality Imaging of Angiogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Approaches to Multimodality Imaging of Angiogenesis
Lawrence W. Dobrucki, Ebo D. de Muinck, Jonathan R. Lindner, Albert J. Sinusas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (Supplement 1) 66S-79S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.074963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Approaches to Multimodality Imaging of Angiogenesis
Lawrence W. Dobrucki, Ebo D. de Muinck, Jonathan R. Lindner, Albert J. Sinusas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (Supplement 1) 66S-79S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.074963
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ANGIOGENESIS
    • CHOICE OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY AND PROBES
    • NUCLEAR APPROACHES
    • ULTRASOUND APPROACHES
    • MAGNETIC RESONANCE APPROACHES
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • State-of-the-Art Methods for Evaluation of Angiogenesis and Tissue Vascularization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Targeting Angiogenesis Using a C-Type Atrial Natriuretic Factor-Conjugated Nanoprobe and PET
  • Monitoring Tumor Response to Antiangiogenic Sunitinib Therapy with 18F-Fluciclatide, an 18F-Labeled &alpha;V{beta}3-Integrin and &alpha;V{beta}5-Integrin Imaging Agent
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pathophysiology of Myocardial Injury and Remodeling: Implications for Molecular Imaging
  • Tracing Cardiac Metabolism In Vivo: One Substrate at a Time
Show more Multimodality Molecular Imaging of the Cardiovascular System

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire