Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

Application of a dosimetry model based on the whole body retention at 48hrs

F Atkins, D VanNostrand, S Moreau, K Burman and L Wartofsky
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1830;
F Atkins
1Wash Hosp Cntr, Div Nuc Med & Endo, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D VanNostrand
1Wash Hosp Cntr, Div Nuc Med & Endo, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Moreau
1Wash Hosp Cntr, Div Nuc Med & Endo, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Burman
1Wash Hosp Cntr, Div Nuc Med & Endo, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Wartofsky
1Wash Hosp Cntr, Div Nuc Med & Endo, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1830

Objectives Evaluate prospectively the validity of a simple regression dosimetry model.

Methods Previously we reported on a bi-exponential model (jnm 2007:48:268P) to estimate the maximum tolerated activity (MTA) of I-131 (based on a limit of 2 Gy to the blood) for the treatment of metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC). It uses just the patient’s body surface area (BSA) and the whole body retention of a dx dosage of I-131 at 48 hrs post administration. The following regression model was developed between the MTA normalized to the patient’s BSA and the whole body retention as a % of the administered dose at the 48 hr time point (R): MTA/BSA = [376.0·e-0.0387R+1144.4·e-0.8522R]. This study applied the model prospectively to all adult patients referred for dosimetry and possible radioiodine treatment of WDTC under conditions of thyroid hormone withdrawal. The MTA predicted (MTAp) using the model shown above was compared to the measured MTA (MTAm) with statistical analysis performed using ProStat v4.5.

Results A total of 81 dosimetries were performed in 71 patients (42F;29M) with an MTAm range of [2.3-23.2 GBq] over which the linear correlation between the MTAp and MTAm was excellent (r=0.96) with an avg dev of only +1.2%. However, to avoid overdosing a patient on the basis of the MTAp a weighting factor (< 1.0) should be applied, e.g. using a value of 0.7 would result in only 1 patient receiving a prescribed activity of I-131 that exceeded the MTAm (<3%).

Conclusions A simplified dosimetry model could be used as an alternative method of estimating the MTA for treatment of metastatic WDTC for those facilities without the resources to perform a standard dosimetry protocol or for patients unable or unwilling to.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Application of a dosimetry model based on the whole body retention at 48hrs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Application of a dosimetry model based on the whole body retention at 48hrs
F Atkins, D VanNostrand, S Moreau, K Burman, L Wartofsky
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1830;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Application of a dosimetry model based on the whole body retention at 48hrs
F Atkins, D VanNostrand, S Moreau, K Burman, L Wartofsky
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1830;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

  • Comparisons of animal-human translated and human 18F-BAY94-9172 amyloid radiation dosimetry
  • Preclinical safety, biodistribution and dosimetry estimates of 99mTc-DTPA-glipizide as a novel compound imaging pancreatic islet cells
  • Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) computer code: Comparison with reported analytical methods and predictive value
Show more Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

Dosimetry/ISRTRD Posters

  • Evaluation of radiation doses to relatives of patients treated by I-131 for thyroid carcinoma
  • Preclinical safety, biodistribution and dosimetry estimates of 99mTc-DTPA-glipizide as a novel compound imaging pancreatic islet cells
  • 90Y, 177Lu, and 131I therapy optimisation: Monte Carlo calculation of dose distribution and radiobiological evaluations
Show more Dosimetry/ISRTRD Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire