Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) computer code: Comparison with reported analytical methods and predictive value

Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan and Raymond Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1858;
Zhongli Cai
1University of Toronto, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Pignol
2University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conrad Chan
1University of Toronto, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond Reilly
1University of Toronto, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1858

Objectives Our goal was to compare MCNP self- and cross-doses to the nucleus of breast cancer (BC) cells from the Auger electron-emitter 111In to those calculated by reported analytical methods (Goddu et al. and Farragi et al.). We also incorporated different cell geometries and experimental conditions and determined if MCNP could predict clonogenic survival of BC cells exposed in vitro to 111In-DTPA-hEGF.

Methods MCNP was used to simulate the transport of all electrons emitted by 111In from locations at cell surface (CS), cytoplasm (CY) or nucleus (N). The doses to N per decay (S values) were calculated for single, closely packed monolayer cells or clusters of cells with various cell and nuclear dimensions.

Results For self-doses, MCNP SN→N-values agreed well with those of Goddu et al. [relative difference (RD) of 0.5– 4.0%] and Faraggi et al. (RD -1.1– -2.4%). MCNP S-values of CY and CS to N compared fairly well with the reported values for cells with radii >7 um (RD -7.9 –13.5% for Goddu et al.; -4.9–5.8% for Faraggi et al.). S-values of monolayer cells were significantly different than those of single cell and cell clusters. The predicted cell survival based on calculated S values for monolayer MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, and cell fractionation data and gamma-ray survival correlated well with experimental data (RD 3.1, -1.0 and 1.7%).

Conclusions MCNP is feasible and can reliably assess cellular dosimetry of Auger electron-emitters. S values for monolayer cells predicted the cell survival of BC cells after exposure to 111In-DTPA-hEGF better than S values of Goddu et al. and Faraggi et al.

Research Support Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (Grant No. 19374).

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) computer code: Comparison with reported analytical methods and predictive value
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) computer code: Comparison with reported analytical methods and predictive value
Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan, Raymond Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1858;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) computer code: Comparison with reported analytical methods and predictive value
Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan, Raymond Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1858;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

  • Gamma-H2AX formation in blood cells after thyroid cancer therapy with I-131
  • Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 11C-docetaxel determined using human whole body PET-CT
  • Human dosimetry for the 5-HT6 PET ligand [11C]GSK215083
Show more Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Dosimetry/ISRTRD Alpha Symposium

Dosimetry/ISRTRD Posters

  • Human dosimetry for the 5-HT6 PET ligand [11C]GSK215083
  • TestDose: Software for creating dosimetry problems
  • Radiation dosimetry models of intraventricular injection of 14 radiopharmaceuticals
Show more Dosimetry/ISRTRD Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire