Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Bone pain as a primary predictor of bone metastasis: A retrospective review

Daria Motamedi, Natasha Craig, Jessica Lee, Olga Lyass, Alessandro D'Agnolo and Alan Waxman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1729;
Daria Motamedi
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasha Craig
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Lee
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olga Lyass
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro D'Agnolo
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Waxman
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Imaging, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1729

Objectives FDG-PET scans are often not performed unless cancer pts have a specific complaint such as pain. The purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate pain levels in patients presenting with FDG-PET positive metastatic disease to bone.

Methods Retrospective evaluation of 100 FDG-PET scans in patients with known metastatic disease to bone. Pain was evaluated on a scale from 0-2 with 0 being no pain, 1 being pain not requiring daily medication, and 2 being pain requiring daily medication use. This was evaluated through direct consultation with the primary care physician as well as a comprehensive review of electronic medical records. Studies were reviewed by 2 board certified nuclear medicine physicians. A study was considered positive if a discrete focal abnormality was present above the normal bone/marrow background.

Results 71% (71/100) of patients with PET positive metastatic disease to bone did not experience bone pain. The majority of findings were found in the lytic or trabecular metastatic sites. Table 1 illustrates pain scale percentages in 100 retrospectively reviewed PET positive patients. Table 2 is a complete summary of all 100 patients with corresponding pain scale listings by primary malignancy.

Conclusions FDG-PET detects osseous metastatic disease prior to pts developing pain. Bone pain is not an accurate predictor of metastatic disease to bone in patients with known primary malignancy. FDG-PET imaging should therefore not be deferred until the onset of symptoms but should be used to accurately assess staging.


Embedded Image
  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bone pain as a primary predictor of bone metastasis: A retrospective review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Bone pain as a primary predictor of bone metastasis: A retrospective review
Daria Motamedi, Natasha Craig, Jessica Lee, Olga Lyass, Alessandro D'Agnolo, Alan Waxman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1729;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bone pain as a primary predictor of bone metastasis: A retrospective review
Daria Motamedi, Natasha Craig, Jessica Lee, Olga Lyass, Alessandro D'Agnolo, Alan Waxman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1729;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Clinical utilities of FDG-PET/CT in small cell lung cancer
  • Value of PET for primary staging of endometrial cancer
  • Prognostic significance of pre-operative FDG-PET in colorectal cancer patients with hepatic metastasis
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

  • 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of histologically confirmed germ cell tumors
  • Usability of the heparin appositional whole body FDG PET – New methods to reduce cardiac physiological accumulation
  • Prospective evaluation of diagnostic performance to detect bone metastasis with F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy
Show more Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire