Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Prospective evaluation of diagnostic performance to detect bone metastasis with F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy

Kazuya Shizukuishi, Ukihide Tateishi, Masashi Kawaguchi, Keisuke Yoshida, Tmohiro Yoneyama, Ryogo Minamimoto, Akiko Suzuki, Hiroaki Hagiwara, Jin Lee and Tomio Inoue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1733;
Kazuya Shizukuishi
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ukihide Tateishi
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masashi Kawaguchi
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keisuke Yoshida
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tmohiro Yoneyama
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryogo Minamimoto
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko Suzuki
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroaki Hagiwara
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin Lee
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomio Inoue
1Yokohama City University, Dept of Radiology, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1733

Objectives The aim of the present study was to compare diagnostic performance of bone metastasis prospectively with F-18 NaF PET-CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy (BS).

Methods A total of 190 lesions in 24 patients (mean age, 63 years) with bone metastases who underwent both of whole-body F-18 NaF PET/CT and BS were assessed in this study. We investigated the detectability of bone metastasis with regard to histologic subtypes of primary tumors, morphologic patterns based on CT findings, and distribution on the lesion-basis. Images were assessed independently by 2 readers without knowledge of patient background. All lesions were interpreted according to three diagnostic categories: normal or benign, equivocal, and suspect of malignant.

Results The sensitivity and specificity by categorizing equivocal lesions into benign were 99% and 100% in F-18 NaF PET/CT, 77% and 60% in F-18 NaF PET alone, and 63% and 47% in BS. Detectability of bone metastasis did not depend on modality in prostate (n=73) and breast carcinoma (n=79). However, accuracy in F-18 NaF PET/CT or BS was greater than those of BS in malignant tumors except for prostate and breast carcinomas. Diagnostic accuracy of osteoblastic lesion (n=111) was superior in each modality to those of osteolytic (n=29) or mixed-type lesion (n=36).

Conclusions Diagnostic performance of F-18 NaF PET/CT to detect bone metastasis is superior to BS. Detectability of bone metastasis is significant when stratified by osteoblastic morphologic pattern in this prospective analysis.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prospective evaluation of diagnostic performance to detect bone metastasis with F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prospective evaluation of diagnostic performance to detect bone metastasis with F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy
Kazuya Shizukuishi, Ukihide Tateishi, Masashi Kawaguchi, Keisuke Yoshida, Tmohiro Yoneyama, Ryogo Minamimoto, Akiko Suzuki, Hiroaki Hagiwara, Jin Lee, Tomio Inoue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1733;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prospective evaluation of diagnostic performance to detect bone metastasis with F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy
Kazuya Shizukuishi, Ukihide Tateishi, Masashi Kawaguchi, Keisuke Yoshida, Tmohiro Yoneyama, Ryogo Minamimoto, Akiko Suzuki, Hiroaki Hagiwara, Jin Lee, Tomio Inoue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1733;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Primal analysis of physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the endometrium of women
  • Prediction of therapy outcome in patients with soft tissue sarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using dynamic FDG studies
  • Assessment of somatostatin receptor expression in the management of
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

  • Diagnostic accuracy in gynecological malignant tumors: A comparison between PET/CT and PET/MRI fusion images
  • Cancer imaging biomarker assessment for prediction of early response to chemotherapy
  • Ga-68 DOTATE PET in endocrine tumors: Comparison with SRS, dosimetry, clinical impact
Show more Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire