Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Data Analysis and Management

HRRT and Advance scanner comparison using a steady-state scan approach

Claus Svarer, Lisbeth Marner, Karine Madsen, Sune Keller, Mette Haahr, Merence Sibomana and Gitte Knudsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1409;
Claus Svarer
1Rigshospitalet, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisbeth Marner
1Rigshospitalet, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karine Madsen
1Rigshospitalet, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sune Keller
2Rigshospitalet, PET Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mette Haahr
1Rigshospitalet, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Merence Sibomana
2Rigshospitalet, PET Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gitte Knudsen
1Rigshospitalet, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1409

Objectives With the Siemens HRRT scanner, it is possible to acquire PET images with a higher resolution (< 2mm) than with the clinical GE Advance scanner. For many purposes, it is essential that the acquired HRRT images is quantitative correct. A bolus-infusion approach is optimal for examination of this as both scans can be performed under steady-state conditions.

Methods Using a bolus-infusion scheme (Pinborg, 2003), altanserin tracer images of the 5HT-2A receptor distribution in the brain have been acquired under steady-state conditions for two normal healthy volunteers. First, the subjects were scanned at the Advance scanner (40 min) and afterwards at the HRRT scanner (30 min). The HRRT scans were reconstructed using the new iterative PSF reconstruction with attenuation map improvements (Surry, Comtat, 2008). A Gaussian filter with a FWHM of 10 mm was used to match HRRT images to Advance scanner resolution. Regions of interests were delineated (Svarer, 2004) and these were used for extraction of mean regional values. Scatter plots of the Advance (X axis) and HRRT (Y axis) regional values were generated and the slope of a fitted line was found.

Results The slopes for the original HRRT images were (1.13 and 1.11) and for the resolution matched HRRT images (1.05 and 0.99). For the resolution matched images, the slope is very close to the expected value of 1. The original HRRT images show a higher contrast between high and low binding areas.

Conclusions Using this very stable bolus-infusion approach, it has been possible to compare scans from the HRRT and Advance scanner. As shown, there is a nice correlation between extracted regional values from the two scanners. Three more subjects will be included to confirm this.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
HRRT and Advance scanner comparison using a steady-state scan approach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
HRRT and Advance scanner comparison using a steady-state scan approach
Claus Svarer, Lisbeth Marner, Karine Madsen, Sune Keller, Mette Haahr, Merence Sibomana, Gitte Knudsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1409;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
HRRT and Advance scanner comparison using a steady-state scan approach
Claus Svarer, Lisbeth Marner, Karine Madsen, Sune Keller, Mette Haahr, Merence Sibomana, Gitte Knudsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1409;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Data Analysis and Management

  • Quantification of 99mTc-duramycin uptake kinetics in the area-at-risk after myocardial ischemia and reperfusion using a compartment model
  • Quantitative PET lesion delineation using a three-dimensional adaptive threshold region growing algorithm (RGA): A method for calibration
  • Myocardial activation patterns (MAP) applied to patients with CAD using multi-pinhole SPECT during dobutamine stress
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Data Analysis and Management

Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Evaluation of Quantitative Whole Body Dynamic FDG-PET Using Block Sequence Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Reconstruction
  • Feasibility of 18F-THK5351 PET quantitation using the Centiloid scale
  • NaF-PET/CT for assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy subjects
Show more Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire