Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Pretargeted Versus Directly Targeted Radioimmunotherapy Combined with Anti-CD20 Antibody Consolidation Therapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Robert M. Sharkey, Habibe Karacay, Christine R. Johnson, Samuel Litwin, Edmund A. Rossi, William J. McBride, Chien-Hsing Chang and David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2009, 50 (3) 444-453; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.058602
Robert M. Sharkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Habibe Karacay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine R. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Litwin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmund A. Rossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. McBride
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Hsing Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Goldenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Survival curves for PT-RAIT combined with unconjugated antibodies with PT-RAIT. BALB/c nude mice bearing subcutaneous Ramos tumors underwent PT-RAIT with or without unconjugated antibody. Tumor size was monitored for 16 wk. Animals were removed from study when tumor progressed to greater than or equal to 2.5 cm. Growth curves for individual groups and animals are shown in Supplemental Figure 1 (hLL1, milatuzumab; hA20, veltuzumab; hLL2, epratuzumab).

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Combining PT-RAIT with veltuzumab treatment regimen starting 1 d in advance of TF4 injection: Untreated (A), percentage of animals remaining with tumors less than or equal to 2.5 cm3 (B), PT-RAIT alone (2.25 nmol/355 μg of TF4, followed 29 h later with 9.25 MBq/0.09 nmol of 90Y-IMP-288) (C), and PT-RAIT plus hA20 before and after PT-RAIT (same as treatment C, but 1 mg of veltuzumab was administered 1 d before TF4 and then followed by 3 weekly injections of 0.5 mg of veltuzumab) (D). T0 is time 90Y-IMP-288 was administered. Arrows show times when veltuzumab was administered.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Effect of single predose of veltuzumab (0.25 mg) on PT-RAIT: untreated (A), percentage of animals remaining with tumors less than or equal to 2.5 cm3 (B), PT-RAIT alone (2.25 nmol/355 μg of TF4, followed 29 h later with 9.25 MBq/0.09 nmol of 90Y-IMP-288) (C), and PT-RAIT plus hA20 before and after PT-RAIT (same as treatment C, but 0.25 mg of veltuzumab [hA20] was administered 1 d before TF4 [1 animal was removed at 8.7 wk for NTRT]) (D). T0 is time 90Y-IMP-288 was administered.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Effect of pre- and postdosing with unconjugated veltuzumab on therapeutic activity of 90Y-veltuzumab and PT-RAIT: Untreated (A), PT-RAIT alone (2.25 nmol/355 μg of TF4, followed 29 h later with 9.25 MBq/0.09 nmol of 90Y-IMP-288) (B), PT-RAIT followed 7 d later with veltuzumab, starting with 1 mg and then with 3 weekly doses of 0.5 mg of veltuzumab (C), 4.81 MBq (0.13 mCi; 50 μg) of 90Y-veltuzumab alone (D), treatment D coinjected with 1 mg of epratuzumab (hLL2) at T0, followed by weekly injections × 3 of 0.5 mg of epratuzumab (E), 1 mg of veltuzumab administered 1 d before 90Y-veltuzumab (4.81 MBq/50 μg) and then followed weekly with 3 × 0.5 mg of veltuzumab (F), treatment D followed 1 wk later with 1 mg of veltuzumab, with 3 × 0.5 mg of veltuzumab administered weekly thereafter (G), and percentage of animals remaining with tumors smaller than 2.5 cm3 (H). Ramos tumors were administered 90Y-veltuzumab or PT-RAIT with or without unconjugated antibody. For PT-RAIT, T0 is time 90Y-IMP-288 was administered. Each growth curve shows fraction of animals cured (S) and median time to 2.5 cm3 (MS). Arrows indicate animals removed from study because of TRT or NTRT event.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Effect of single predose of veltuzumab (1 mg) on 90Y-veltuzumab treatment: untreated (A), percentage of animals remaining with tumors smaller than 2.5 cm3 (B), 4.255 MBq (0.115 mCi; 50 μg) of 90Y-veltuzumab alone (C), treatment C, first administered 1 mg of veltuzumab (arrowhead) 1 d in advance of 90Y-veltuzumab injection (D).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Effect of Veltuzumab Advanced Dose on Biodistribution of 111In-Veltuzumab IgG or TF4-Pretargeted 111In-IMP-288

    Set ASet BSet C
    Antibody and targetNo predose1.0 mg/1 dNo predose0.25 mg/1 dNo predose0.25 mg/1 h1.0 mg/1 h
    111In-veltuzumab IgG
     Tumor16.9 ± 4.19.0 ± 1.422.5 ± 3.816.8 ± 2.022.1 ± 2.718.1 ± 2.513.2 ± 4.5
     Tumor weight0.532 ± 0.1240.677 ± 0.3020.264 ± 0.0810.255 ± 0.0470.307 ± 0.1500.323 ± 0.1440.352 ± 0.258
     Liver3.5 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.54.7 ± 1.75.6 ± 0.44.1 ± 0.44.7 ± 1.34.7 ± 0.3
     Spleen4.3 ± 1.84.3 ± 0.55.4 ± 4.05.6 ± 0.83.6 ± 0.84.1 ± 1.04.3 ± 0.5
     Kidneys5.0 ± 0.77.1 ± 1.04.8 ± 0.55.40 ± 0.85.2 ± 0.66.7 ± 1.26.6 ± 0.3
     Lungs6.9 ± 1.57.8 ± 1.05.9 ± 1.07.2 ± 1.56.0 ± 2.46.0 ± 1.07.7 ± 2.9
     Blood14.8 ± 2.020.3 ± 2.616.1 ± 2.322.6 ± 2.315.2 ± 1.918.2 ± 2.819.8 ± 2.2
    TF4-pretargeted 111In-IMP-288
     Tumor11.28 ± 0.21*2.96 ± 0.75*13.40 ± 0.606.82 ± 0.75*13.23 ± 1.816.74 ± 1.512.40 ± 0.61
     Tumor weight0.559 ± 0.2090.754 ± 0.2530.303 ± 0.0610.469 ± 0.1800.228 ± 0.0670.329 ± 0.1310.195 ± 0.063
     Liver0.43 ± 0.120.68 ± 0.170.63 ± 0.100.71 ± 0.170.66 ± 0.300.81 ± 0.140.77 ± 0.25
     Spleen0.63 ± 0.231.38 ± 0.521.40 ± 0.711.40 ± 0.561.32 ± 0.981.29 ± 0.691.23 ± 0.51
     Kidneys1.14 ± 0.141.50 ± 0.091.38 ± 0.181.31 ± 0.261.53 ± 0.271.46 ± 0.241.27 ± 0.15
     Lungs0.37 ± 0.030.68 ± 0.390.34 ± 0.060.42 ± 0.090.48 ± 0.140.38 ± 0.040.50 ± 0.22
     Blood0.01 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.01
    • Animals were necropsied either 3 d after 111In-veltuzumab injection or 24 h after 111In-IMP-288 injection (111In-IMP-288 was administered 29.5 h after TF4). %ID/g for each groups is shown (mean ± SD; n = 5/group, except where indicated by *, where n = 4).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figure
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 3
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pretargeted Versus Directly Targeted Radioimmunotherapy Combined with Anti-CD20 Antibody Consolidation Therapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Pretargeted Versus Directly Targeted Radioimmunotherapy Combined with Anti-CD20 Antibody Consolidation Therapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Robert M. Sharkey, Habibe Karacay, Christine R. Johnson, Samuel Litwin, Edmund A. Rossi, William J. McBride, Chien-Hsing Chang, David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2009, 50 (3) 444-453; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058602

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pretargeted Versus Directly Targeted Radioimmunotherapy Combined with Anti-CD20 Antibody Consolidation Therapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Robert M. Sharkey, Habibe Karacay, Christine R. Johnson, Samuel Litwin, Edmund A. Rossi, William J. McBride, Chien-Hsing Chang, David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2009, 50 (3) 444-453; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058602
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Antibody Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Anticancer Drug Development
  • A New Tri-Fab Bispecific Antibody for Pretargeting Trop-2-Expressing Epithelial Cancers
  • Differential Effects of Predosing on Tumor and Tissue Uptake of an 111In-Labeled Anti-TENB2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate
  • Effect of Small-Molecule-Binding Affinity on Tumor Uptake In Vivo: A Systematic Study Using a Pretargeted Bispecific Antibody
  • Epratuzumab-SN-38: A New Antibody-Drug Conjugate for the Therapy of Hematologic Malignancies
  • Antibody-Radionuclide Conjugates for Cancer Therapy: Historical Considerations and New Trends
  • Combination Radioimmunotherapy and Chemoimmunotherapy Involving Different or the Same Targets Improves Therapy of Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Xenograft Models
  • A re-examination of radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: prospects for dual-targeted antibody/radioantibody therapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire