The “Results” section of the article “Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Gallbladder Carcinoma” by Nishiyama et al. (J Nucl Med. 2006;47:633–638) contained 3 errors. The fifth sentence of the second paragraph should read “Overall, for visual analysis of gallbladder carcinoma, delayed PET improved the diagnosis in 2 patients (6%).” The second sentence of the third paragraph should read “The sensitivity of diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma using semiquantitative analysis of PET images was improved for delayed imaging and combined early and delayed imaging—in 3 patients (13%) and 4 patients (17%), respectively.” The second sentence of the fourth paragraph should read “CRP levels were measured in all patients except two.”